this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
267 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

35126 readers
101 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

What's going to stop the forms being filled out by industry-controlled bots this time?^1 Last time the FCC took public comment, anti-net-neutrality comments were being made under the names of dead people and people who would later claim they never participated in making comments to the FCC.

Otherwise, it's going to be the same dumb shitshow as last time.

[–] jubilationtcornpone 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I used to work in utilities. Electric, not telecom so different set of regulators. What they would do is yank you into and office and tell you something to the effect of: "[Name of Regulatory Body] is considering [issue]. You should really consider going on the public comment section of their website and voicing your [support/opposition depending on corporate stance] for it. It's not mandatory but you should really consider doing that. It's very important to our company."

It wasn't "mandatory" but they would repeatedly hound you until you either did it or told them to fuck off, at which point you would be branded a "troublemaker" and they would find ways to punish you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The same dumb shitshow as last time is probably the goal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

It did a great job of discrediting opening anything for public comment thenceforth. Which I really think was the long-term goal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Damn, I forgot all about that. I think one was made under my name and some family, and it was all the same copy-paste letter.

Did anything ever come of that or did it just get swept under the rug?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Swept under the rug, thus my concerns here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

But they can claim it was done in an open and democratic way.