news

I'm glad that you're completely unaffected by this and don't give a shit but for those of us that are affected you need to realise almost all of us have dead friends (plural, for some of us it's dozens) over transphobic policy making and we absolutely regard you as responsible for those deaths. Maybe this will put into some perspective why seeing you physically feel what we feel might crack something in you that lets you feel a little bit of fucking empathy.

Did any of this go through your mind before you decided to barrel in here and utterly disregard the obvious nature of trans people hurting? Nah. You didn't give a fuck because you're a transphobic bag of shit without emotions.

Every single person that supports anything killing the people I love absolutely deserves physical harm and to be tossed out of any future socialist country. If I had my way I'd make a ridiculous spectacle of it. You'd be loaded into giant overpowered novelty circus cannons and launched into the sea where you can figure out where you want to swim, not my problem.

Eat shit. This is not a joke, this is not a game, people die over this shit. This is the real world and you're talking to the real people affected by it communicating their emotions in the absolutely raw way they deserve to be communicated. Have some fucking respect and stop being an animal.

you're using "physical violence" as a rhetorical trump card as if we all obviously oppose violence, when that's not at all the case.

for one thing, liberals support physical violence against us. is it not violent to have armed men on call to defend food from hungry homeless people? was it not violent for the state to send jackbooted thugs to remove them from their homes in the first place? or how about the violence done against the population of countries that liberals reduce to ruins?

it's perfectly moral and good for us to enact violence in return on our enemies who do these things to us. liberals only think that violence is some kind of dreadful red line because they benefit enough from the system to not be particularly bothered by its ugly side

The most perturbing question for the liberal is the question of violence. The liberal’s initial reaction to violence is to try to convince the oppressed that violence is an incorrect tactic, that violence will not work, that violence never accomplishes anything. The Europeans took America through violence and through violence they established the most powerful country in the world. Through violence they maintain the most powerful country in the world. It is absolutely absurd for one to say that violence never accomplishes anything. ...

Now, I think the biggest problem with the white liberal in America, and perhaps the liberal around the world, is that his primary task is to stop confrontation, stop conflicts, not to redress grievances, but to stop confrontation. And this is very clear, it must become very, very clear in all our minds. Because once we see what the primary task of the liberal is, then we can see the necessity of not wasting time with him. His primary role is to stop confrontation. Because the liberal assumes a priori that a confrontation is not going to solve the problem. This, of course, is an incorrect assumption. We know that.

We need not waste time showing that this assumption of the liberals is clearly ridiculous. I think that history has shown that confrontation in many cases has resolved quite a number of problems — look at the Russian revolution, the Cuban revolution, the Chinese revolution. In many cases, stopping confrontation really means prolonging suffering.

The liberal is so preoccupied with stopping confrontation that he usually finds himself defending and calling for law and order, the law and order of the oppressor. Confrontation would disrupt the smooth functioning of the society and so the politics of the liberal leads him into a position where he finds himself politically aligned with the oppressor rather than with the oppressed.

The reason the liberal seeks to stop confrontation — and this is the second pitfall of liberalism — is that his role, regardless of what he says, is really to maintain the status quo, rather than to change it. He enjoys economic stability from the status quo and if he fights for change he is risking his economic stability. ... What the liberal really wants is to bring about change which will not in any way endanger his position. ...

These pitfalls are present in his politics because the liberal is part of the oppressor. He enjoys the status quo; while he himself may not be actively oppressing other people, he enjoys the fruits of that oppression. And he rhetorically tries to claim that he is disgusted with the system as it is. ~___~

harm to trans people: I sleep

harm to cis people: I wake

get some perspective