this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
378 points (99.0% liked)

World News

38506 readers
2796 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Corkyskog 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it was not I believe. But it doesn't mean that the COVID aspect wouldn't be weighed into the matter. Still likely would have ended up with them losing, either way in my opinion unfortunately.

I am way too liberal about this sort of stuff and I think you should only be able to go after sharing/pirating if you can definitively prove it's causing greater harm to your product then it's benefit.

I often borrow/pirate something to end up paying for another related book, game, Shows or movies, etc. I would have never even bothered if I couldn't have borrowed/pirated in the first place as I am not going to throw money at shit that is likely going to be crap. Pirating and free lending allows for people to get an intro to something, if it's good it will lure users into the book/show or whatever's universe. Causing them to be much more likely to purchase in the future.

Then once the actuaries calculate out that number the only damages you should be able to claim are the difference, if there even is a difference.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you should only be able to go after sharing/pirating if you can definitively prove it’s causing greater harm to your product then it’s benefit.

The problem is that while most of us agree, we all also know that isn't how the world works. IA is a major name, they are obviously not operating under the radar. They picked a fight they weren't ready to take on and they should've known better, but instead they decided to jeopardize the entire project.

If you want to be The Pirate Bay, then you need to play it smart like The Pirate Bay. This was reckless and short sighted.

[–] Corkyskog 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just because its not how it currently works, doesn't mean it can't be changed. We do have an entire branch of government to do just that. I am not optimistic positive changes will be made in that regard, but it doesn't hurt to talk about it.