this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
586 points (94.1% liked)

World News

32368 readers
505 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Do you seriously have to ask?

This post wasn't difficult to find.

Acting as if ending the war is Ukraine's responsibility, rather than one of the country engaging in a literal invasion.

Anyone who doesn't take the 2014 referendum with an extreme grain of salt is slotting nicely into Russia's current playbook.

I seriously don't understand why so many of you dickride Russia, other than "west bad". The current Russian government is antithetical to so many of the values you claim to champion.

https://hexbear.net/comment/3865920

Here's another for the road.

EDIT:

Numerous comments people claiming that the Maidan Revolution was actually a US backed coup, with zero evidence provided outside of Kremlin and state operated mouthpieces of course.

Possibly the most egregious yet: apparently the Bucha massacre was a hoax. Remember all those videos we saw of Russian soldiers gunning down unarmed civilians? Apparently they all must have been doctored, or were actually Ukrainian soldiers dressed up as Russian soldiers gunning down their own people.

One of my close friends is a Ukrainian photographer/videographer who was among the first on the scene after the Russians left Bucha. You've very likely seen some of his photos before. I can only imagine the rage he'd feel if he were to read some of the bullshit that these comments are attempting to spread.

Honestly, my opinion of HexBear has reached a new low after this thread. I used to be against defederation, but now I can at least understand why people don't want to be associated at all with your instance.

EDIT 2: This post was locally removed on HexBear. I think that says enough on its own.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago

So a post that highlights the many offramps to the current conflict, and describes how Ukraine can no longer "win" is Kremlin propaganda?
The other is a post that describes that Ukraine has killed civilians in the Donbass under Zelensky, do you dispute this?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You claim that these are examples of "confirmed Kremlin propaganda". What sources and/or authorities confirm the opinions contained in these posts as Kremlin propaganda?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's one. It's a business insider article disputing the Russian line on the Bucha massacre.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Neither of the posts linked to in the removed post talked about the Bucha massacre though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's in the post from the person above that we're all replying to.

https://lemmy.zip/comment/2294680

Possibly the most egregious yet: apparently the Bucha massacre was a hoax. Remember all those videos we saw of Russian soldiers gunning down unarmed civilians? Apparently they all must have been doctored, or were actually Ukrainian soldiers dressed up as Russian soldiers gunning down their own people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no video evidence of the Bucha massacre though? It is based on Ukrainian investigation and an Amnesty investigation. Granted I tend to believe it happened, or at least I disbelieve the counter narrative that the UAF did it, but I don't know what videos you're talking about

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

See, this is what everyone is talking about. At lest you believe it, but so many others only believe the Russian propaganda and when someone disproves it, they just say it's western propaganda, which is apparently not true but Russian propaganda is?

There's tons of photos, videos, satellite images, and accounts by locals. It's been investigated by the UN Commissioner of Human Rights and numerous news agencies who published their proof. Most of the footage was of the aftermath but it's still proof, especially when combined with drone and satellite footage from before the reporters got there. Or you think the bodies were faked (been disapproved) and reporters from CNN, BBC, AFP, and more didn't see what they saw when they entered the area? They saw a bunch of fake Halloween corpses and couldn't tell the difference between that and real dead civilians, who had been raped, burned, and murdered? Or actors? Some of The Russian lies are unbelievable so it's incredible to me that people keep buying into them.

Here's some videos from CNN and BBC and the New York Times.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I've seen a lot of the evidence, journalistic investigations, which were pretty compelling I just noted there's no direct video evidence. But I do also believe UAF committed severe damage retaking the territory. There is a lot of evidence of civilian murders in UAF retreats in Mariupol as well. AFRF executing prisoners like in the NYT video, or the indiscriminate front line fire against civilians, the Kyiv corridor and southern campaign were a guerilla mindfuck. Civilian casualties are a lot lower now, but the urban conflict at its height was just incredibly brutal and indiscriminate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's possible to believe both at the same time and I applaud you for being able to hold both thoughts in your head. I'm not even being sarcastic, I've never seen a hexbear user criticize Russia or say they've ever possibly done something wrong in the war or it's lead up. So just by admitting the possibility that they could've done it, even if the UAF have done terrible things too, you've made me feel a little better. It's nice to see some nuance finally lol. And ya, war is hell.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I see this one a lot.

I seriously don't understand why so many of you dickride Russia, other than "west bad". The current Russian government is antithetical to so many of the values you claim to champion.

Seriously, who? Who is "dickriding Russia because west bad"? The current state of Russia is the result of the USSR's undemocratic dissolution and the subsequent shock doctrine, obviously it's antithetical to our values. Everyone knows that. People aren't being blinded by "west bad" - because they generally aren't literal children who can only understand the world in terms of good guys and bad guys. What they're doing is critically analyzing media and history.

Hate to employ the dreaded whataboutism, but it seems to me this critique applies more to the opposite side. You say people are "Slotting nicely into Russia's playbook", "parroting Kremlin propaganda". On their own, these are empty thought-terminators. You're not concerned about understanding reality, just about making absolutely sure you're 100% not on "Russia's side" of this issue, because they're the bad guys in this dichotomy.

I seriously don't understand why so many of you dickride the west, other than "Russia bad". The current western governments are antithetical to so many of the values you claim to champion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You guys say that but I've never seen a hexbear criticizing Russia or their side of the story, only accept it as gospel. You say you don't do that but then blindly accept their time line for the Bucha massacre or pretend their reasons for attacking a sovereign nation are real or ignore a bunch of irregularities in their 2014 referendum voting. Russia leaving is apparently never an option when they talk about possible solutions, only Ukraine giving up territory. You say the world isn't only good guys and bad guys but because when the things you guys say are actually analyzed, it's obvious that it's a lie. The west is bad, everyone else is less bad. Therefore in any thread with Ukraine, because the west is on their side, they are the bad guys. Even though Russia also has a corruption problem and Nazi problem and has a history of invading their numbers for decades. But they have the bigger military, so I guess all their neighbors have to give up their best territory to Russia for free and their citizens shouldn't expect to do anything about it and the the rest of the world has to let them.

Meanwhile, many of the people who criticize Russia in this attack don't dickride the West at all and hate plenty of things about it and will say it in the same thread or tons of others. Like they should definitely decide whether they'll fully support Ukraine or not, but we all know that to do that they'd have to get more support from their voters, which is often more difficult said than done, especially since Ukraine isn't actually in NATO.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

spoiler

I seriously don't understand why so many of you dickride Russia

love how liberals manage to weave in casual homophobia whenever geopolitics comes up, you people make me sick

It's not because of blind allegiance to Russia or anything like that, people have positions counter to your narrative as the result of actually paying attention to events, as they've unfolded, over years.

Impressive how mad you babies get when people don't swallow the lies you're peddling, expecting them to be taken as implicitly true or something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Talk about swallowing lies after regurgitating Russian propaganda? You are all blinded yourself by your hate for the US that you are willing to deny massacres or genocides.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What Russian propaganda? I live in the US, I have more of a problem with my government than a government on the other side of the planet, no matter how scary the liberals try to make them sound.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Are you serious? We just went through a ton of examples in the post above that we're all replying to.

And it's not even an exhaustive list. I've seen others parrot the idea that Ukraine was doing a genocide in Donbas, a Russian accusation without proof, for example. This is what I mean about you guys skeptical about every side of the story except for Russia's.

Also, which side do you think the Russians are supporting in the US? Because it's not the left...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, which side do you think the Russians are supporting in the US? Because it's not the left...

I frankly don't care who the Russians are supporting politically in the US because their propaganda capacity is near insignificant. Also, the Democrats are a right wing political formation, they will fight to protect landlords and break strikes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apparently their propaganda is not that insignificant considering how many people on the right, and you all, are falling for it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If they're spending their time messaging to a bunch of powerless leftists on their own closed off server they're wasting their time, what does that even accomplish?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Already read the post you linked with casual homophobia/misogyny in it, it's wild how libs just let that rip as soon as it's about a state enemy.

The Donbass has been getting shelled for almost a decade, and until recently it was pretty much entirely the work of the Ukrainian government.

The US is a world historic force of evil, can you blame us for not taking their propagandists at their word?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just because they used the word "dick" doesn't mean it's homophobic/mysognist. Also it doesn't detract from their other points.

The insurgents had been shooting people and using bombs or mortars and artillery since at least 2014. They even shot down airplanes back then. It wasn't just the Ukrainian government.

OK, but why take the Russian propaganda for their word? And at some point you have to take some evidence of historical accounts or you're just going going by conspiracy theories.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Just because they used the word "dick" doesn't mean it's homophobic/mysognist. Also it doesn't detract from their other points.

I had to circle back to this one because the comment in question was not just misogynist for using " dick", but because of the implication that dickriding bad, why else use it in that context if it was intended to read as a positive connotation?

As soon as libs feel like it's a "safe" target they just let loose with the misogyny and homophobia.

I didn't address the threads they presented as evidence because I didn't see anything wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don't take Russian propaganda at their word, I also have decades of history to reference, all the rabid-ass Ukrainian propaganda, plus literally paying attention to shit going on in the last decade

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The insurgents had been shooting people and using bombs or mortars and artillery since at least 2014. They even shot down airplanes back then. It wasn't just the Ukrainian government.

Yes, since the coup shit has been absolutely fucked, and all diplomatic solutions have been derailed.