this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
45 points (94.1% liked)
Canada
7365 readers
742 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
π Meta
πΊοΈ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
ποΈ Cities / Local Communities
- Calgary (AB)
- Edmonton (AB)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
π Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- MontrΓ©al Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
π» Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
π΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Buy Canadian
- Quebec Finance
- Churning Canada
π£οΈ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
π Social / Culture
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't get his argument. In ANY job, if you publically say (or do) something that goes against the values of the company you work for, you get punished (or fired).
This has been the case for every homophobe, racist, sexual pervert, Holocaust denier, and customer service abuser to make the news.
I think you shouldn't get fired for saying anything (that would be covered by the 1st amendment in the US (which I think doesn't cover blatant hate-speech)) that goes against the values of the company you work for.
But is the "Ontario college of psychologists" like an "order" where its member are held to a higher standard because they have an important role? Like a doctor is not supposed to fuck a client. I can agree to higher standards then.
Anyway, if the quote's context is true, as a psychologist, telling people to kill themselves is fucked up.
It's a regulatory body for psychologists in Ontario Canada. All Psychologists must be registered with them to be licensed.
This only covers what speech congress may abridge. Nothing of your employers or other entities. It would be different if your employer could send you to prison over your speech, but that's not the reality.
Gotcha.
I think that your workplace can't fire you for stupid reasons, like if you say to vote for another candidate that your boss wants or for refusing to participate in a tiktok video, so I assumed that there was some "free spech" protecting you for that.
If your political beliefs are tied to race, religion, or gender, they'd be covered by Title VII of the CRA. If your political motivations are driven by a desire for better employment law, they may be protected by the NLRA. Beyond that, laws protecting political speech and beliefs of employees would be potentially state antidiscrimination laws, off-duty conduct laws, and coercion laws, but of course that varies state-by-state.
Well, thats were the weeds start, your boss isn't really allowed to fire you for who you vote for, as they are not entitled to know that info (they would need to violate your rights to find out against your will).
But if you go around spewing hate speech, inciting violence they can definitely shit can you.
I meant if you said it publicly. I think they can't fire you for that.
Yeah, that's what I was saying.
The right to freedom of speech is not unlimited in Canada. It's specified in section 2b of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as "freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;" but section 1 of the Charter says, "The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society." Plus, that only affects the government's ability to curtail your freedom of speech.
In any case, the Ontario College of Psychologists is not a government body, but a professional college. This guy behaved unprofessionally, and therefore is a reasonable target for professional sanctions. Since words are one of a psychologist's instruments for treating (mental) illnesses, what he's done is pretty damned close to a regular physician who's approached by someone at a party suggesting they take a drug that they know won't treat the illness and has nasty and occasionally fatal side effects (rather than just telling them to go away). Technically that person is not their patient, but they still have a minimal duty of care not to give advice that they know to be actively harmful.
He can have either the freedom to be verbally abusive in public or retain his license to practice psychology. I don't think it's unreasonable to ask him to find a new job if his current one asks more of him than he wants to give.
The 1st amendment absolutely covers hate speech. Employers can and should be able to fire employees for what they say. Have you ever had a job before? Do you realize how much damage you can do to an organization and its reputation with just first amendment speech?