UK Politics

3023 readers

115 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

UK Labour are too Tory for me. (med-mastodon.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

UK Labour are too Tory for me.
I've threatened that they've lost my vote. (edit)
On LGBTQIA, specifically trans rights.
On their plans for the NHS.
On their plans for health and wealth inequalities in the UK.
On their plans for the relationship the UK has with Europe.
They have to be less Tory to get my vote back.
It's not acceptable that to not vote Tory, we have to settle for what they offer. They assume their position is acceptable.
If they correct their position, I'll reconsider
@uk_politics

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That is definitely less important than your vote. Also, I'm unconvinced you've read the article in the time you've had since I posted it.

EDIT: Why have you replied in so many different comments? I can't follow your argument if it's spread out like this!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think you might have broken them.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@frankPodmore
It is precisely as important because I value my vote and I decide to whom I give it, and because they need to know why they have my vote or not. The article is 632 words long.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even this argument shows that the 'why' of voting is subsidiary to the fact of voting, which is the opposite point to the one you intend.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@frankPodmore Only if you assume that my intention is to make good on the threat.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's not much of a threat if you don't, is it?