politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
reminds me of that Ken Patti twitter post:
This is my favourite post today oh my god. Four more swamps!
Lets not ignore the glorius coal milk and digging for it, or the animated gun.
Man in a hard hat, man in a harder hat, gun that is alive.
Ooh I want that on a t-shirt
😂
I don't know why, but this line got me.
I think because I can't tell if it's AI, or Trump. AI is good at melting in things that sound like they belong but don't (Steve Jobs), but given the original material it learned from it might actually be faithfully riffing on the source.
It's not actually written by a chatbot anyways, it's just written to sound like it is
It's really not even that. These were generally considered to be obvious fakes when they became popular about 5 years ago.
In particular, they made funny mistakes that weren't very likely from the models of the time, while acing things that were very difficult at the time.
was my favorite
Why do you hate that bot?
who said I hated it? also, it’s not really written by a chatbot. it was later revealed that the comedian had written all of this (and another, similar “chatbot script”) themselves and simply passed it off as such.
I was joking. Forcing anyone or anything to watch 1000 hours of Trump rallies sounds like torture
if nothing else, it’s proven to cause irreversible insanity at far fewer than 1000 hours.
I'm pretty sure none of these things are written by a bot.
I just said precisely that
It got the repetitive short sentences that amount to nothing down.