this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
174 points (70.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

1804 readers
185 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 172 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (38 children)

Calling China communist is a stretch. More like planned authoritarian capitalism tempered with socialism. China has 607 billionaires, communism would have 0.

[–] lurch 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

to be fair, in communism corruption and favoritism have always been creating rich people as well, similar to capitalism, but usually not in the same scale. greed is a problem that has to be addressed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then that system is not communist regardless of what they call themselves or what their political opponent calls them! If they are in a fundamental opposition to the work of Marx then they are not communist

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the problem though, communism is 'everyone puts their resources in a big pile and then we re-ditribute them evenly' and then you realise you need someone to administrate the distribution and hope like an idiot that they don't just take the whole pile for themselves. Capitalism is 'everyone maintains their own pile' and you hope like an idiot that the people with the biggest piles don't conspire to steal everyone elses for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Communism is not "everyone puts their resources in a big pile and we re-distribute them evenly." Marx blasted the "equalitarians" who wished to do so. Communism is about collectively running production to fulfill the needs of the people. Your random anecdote can best be countered by asking why managers of single payer healthcare institutions aren't just taking all of the surgery for themselves, or why post office managers aren't shipping all of their own packages instead of others.

Now, Social programs are not "socialism" themselves, but these are quick examples.

load more comments (36 replies)