this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
574 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

70440 readers
3291 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Not advocating for our against but 2 thoughts here:

1: Gabe isn't Musk. Yes money etc but don't immediately jump there without other malfeasance please. Caution absolutely but don't ascribe one rich assholes shit to another.

2: He probably has hard data on accessibility... Possibly more than nearly anyone else. There's a HUGE portion of the population that can't use "traditional" controllers or other input devices. And that's not even going into the medical realm.

Could game Gabe be starting his villain phase? Sure! But until more negative details come out I'm just hoping this is investments he'd use toward a new steam controller.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, if we were putting billionaires against the wall, GabeN would probably be near the end of the line.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There was a time the same was true for Elon Musk, before he suddenly decided to jump the queue. I really hope Gabe isn't going down that path.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Gabe spends a lot of time at sea since the pandemic, and kinda comes off like he has some soft libertarian vibes about self sufficiency and governance.

For me? He's human and rich. It's reason enough to be suspicious.

Would I get it? I won't be first, that's all I know.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You don't get to be a billionaire without some malfeasance.

And even if you don't assume actively malicious intent like you should with Musk, there's a lot of potential danger with technology like this, and if you don't stand a lot to gain, and have reasonable controls against things going wrong, it's probably not a good idea to be an early adopter. It's just like a pacemaker, there are a narrow segment of people who should want to test a new model/concept for them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Absolutely agree at every part.

My desire would be strong regulation via a real agency (not current US), or alternatively ONLY work via non-intrusive means on the scalp.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

let's not circlejerk and have a soft spot for a billionaire just because you like video games. why give gaben the benefit of the doubt just because you think steam is a good product? if they're a billionaire doing this, we can assume this is a money making venture.

if you're a billionaire, you're already way into your villain phase. he's not musk, but he's one of them. you don't make a billion dollars. you take a billion dollars.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (3 children)

So, you are reading things I didn't write. I'm not defending him about steam games etc... The only good will here about any of it is the work toward better Linux life.

I agree billionaires shouldn't exist.

I don't like steam.

I don't really do much gaming... And it's worth stuff from GOG.

Chill out. I'm not the fanboi you are looking for.

I'm only saying perhaps he sees $$$ in a venture that is rife with much worse people doing far worse to vulnerable people.

On the off chance better access comes about from rich assholes eating each other, I'm game to at least watch.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I'm willing to say more positive things about him. His dedication to Linux is great of course, but I've also heard that people working for him get a lot of freedom to choose what to work on. And no crunch. In the games industry, that's pretty good.

So yeah, he seems to me to be one of the better among the tech billionaires. But in the end, he's still a billionaire, and he's god that ridiculous fleet of super yachts.

[–] Jax 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

First step to getting away with shithead behavior is convincing a group, any group (but preferrably one marginalized), that you're representing them.

Idk, there are tons of good things that have happened from rich people doing stuff. Hell, that's the reason medicine progressed — if nobles weren't terrified of dying, who knows how long it would have taken to figure out that bloodletting with leeches doesn't work?

I don't think I need to point out all the bad things that have happened because of the rich.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not saying represent by any stretch.

If I need X thing to survive, I'd rather get it from a pure and innocent source... If that's not possible, I'd rather it from the dude with too many boats who charges too much money than the one actively gloating about destroying lives literally and on a much higher scale.

Yes I know lesser evil etc... This isn't a philosophy course and I don't need what they're selling. But many do potentially and I'd rather minimize damage than just let the absolute worst be the default.

[–] Jax 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I respect that, I just try to provide context. It's often misinterpreted, and I do succumb to emotional responses — but my goal is to make sure those that are justified approach their goals with a clear mind.

I'm not advocating for the rich. I just want people to make the right decisions when it inevitably comes to the point where we need to decide what to do with the rich. I don't think we should treat GabeN with any more respect than we owe the poorest person, is all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm not. your post is literally saying we should be nicer to him because he's not Elon. you're saying we should be easy on him because he might be doing some good. I'm saying we shouldn't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No. "Don't immediately assume he's doing the same exact evil" is not the same as "be nicer".

At the least, it's "assume other bad motives perhaps".

My thought is this is just another way to milk money from others. That simple. Not "let's bribe govts".

If it's assumed he's doing the exact same as Musk, then we either prepare to undo the damage incorrectly, or waste time looking at the wrong stooge.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

you're quoting yourself but you never said that. you said maybe Gabe could be entering his villain phase, as if he's not there yet. thus implying you meant he's not a villain, so we shouldn't assume the worse. I get what you say now, but you did not say what you meant in your original comment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Billionaires either inherit their money or get it by being an asshole. Being nice doesn’t make people billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There are a few exceptions. JK Rowlings became a billionaire simply by writing some really popular books, and even stopped being a billionaire by giving much of her wealth away. As far as I can tell, she didn't become an asshole until later.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I bet she was always an asshole, she just hid it from the general public.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

The billionaires today have an opportunity to eliminate world hunger yet they don't. Instead, they fly rocketships, sail on giant yachts and buy island compounds or towns in Texas. So yeah, No one at that RB club is going to win a Nobel Peace Prize. They all suck.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

There is literally no evidence of that other than tankie memes.

I am ready for my 99999 downvotes and insults for not going with the propaganda. Nothing prevents someone for eventually saving up billion by making a good product in todays digital age. Nothing requires you to be evil. Countries having shit tax policies that do not get the full benefit of having hyper rich is a country policy issue. Killing people is not the solution, change in policies is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

nah. you need to be pretty fucking terrible to build a business where your share of it is worth a billion dollars. you do so by cheating your customers, employees, and competition. valve is no exception.

there are plenty of companies out there that pay their employees decently, make good products, and compete fairly. those companies usually aren't worth that much and their leaders aren't making a billion dollars from it. you're right that the tax policies are shit, but it's not like you ever accidentally become a billionaire. you do so by cheating the tax system too and screwing the general public.

and nobody said anything about killing people.