this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
386 points (99.7% liked)

Ukraine

9963 readers
277 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

💳 Defense Aid 💥


💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️


🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

[email protected]

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skiluros 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And the Holodomor didn't have a specific goal to killing a large part of the Ukrainian population?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

@Skiluros Possibly, there's no consensus on it being a genocide but some scholars do make the argument. But even accepting that as a given it still falls short of the Nazi goals as the scope is more limited so it doesn't really matter for what I said.

And I reiterate that still isn't to say the Soviet regime wasn't totalitarian, murderous, brutal etc. It's like choosing between the plague and cholera.

@ukraine

[–] Skiluros 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No consensus? That's like arguing there is no consensus that the holocaust was a genocide.

The holodomor and the mass killing by both Lenin and Stalin are very much a consensus historical fact.

Tankie and russian bullshit is not relevant.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@Skiluros you're just wrong on that one. There exists much more of a consensus on the Holocaust being a genocide than the Holodomor being one. That is if we are speaking in strictly academic terms. The general public tends to use the term much more loosely in numerous contexts...

[–] Skiluros 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Nice try trying to portray me as the "ignorant public". There is enough serious academic consensus on the Holodomor being a Soviet-created genocide. Stalin and Lenin were mass murderers. The whole Soviet regime was a bunch of brutal authoritarians that lacked humanity. This is historical fact.

Tankie and tankie-adjacent academics need not apply.

Note the creation date of my Lemmy account. You think you're the first person I've encountered that's spewing such tankie bullshit? Why would you think your attempts at lying would work?

You do understand the tankie copytext and the pretend reasoned tone (when using accounts outside of the three tankie septic tank instances) are always very similar?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@Skiluros you're completely misunderstanding me if you think I'm "spewing tankie bullshit". I'm not disagreeing that the Soviet regime was indeed all of those things.

I'm done here anyway. Pointless to argue about minor points with unreasonable people who think they know it all when they clearly don't.

[–] Skiluros 2 points 2 weeks ago

Totally, we must all bow down your intellectual might.

There is no academic consensus on the Holodomor. There is no academic consensus that Stalin killed more Soviet civilians than Hitler (with Lenin being close too). None at all!

And under no condition should we use our brains (that's the sole prerogative of ikuturso the final arbitrator of historical consensus) and recognize that tankie academics (or russians) denying the Holodomor is irrelevant to historical consensus.

Nor should we recognize that tankies denying the Holodomor are going to be using the holocaust as a cover for their murderous polemics.