this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
494 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

70107 readers
2260 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

some tools are actually strictly bad to use, like nuclear bombs, landmines, or chemical weapons

[–] explodicle 3 points 4 days ago

Nuclear bombs have one theoretically beneficial use: deflecting planet-killer asteroids.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You’re just describing weapons made from tools.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Weapons are tools. They are tools engineered for death.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And some tools are bad to use. People generally don't like death.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Yes, those tools are called ‘weapons.’ Are you implying AI is a weapon?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

certainly some AI is weaponry

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Yes, we should outlaw weaponization of AI. I would support that.

We don’t outlaw knives. But we punish their use as a weapon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I'm implying it's undesirable.