this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
78 points (98.8% liked)

micromobility - Bikes, scooters, boards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility

2721 readers
25 users here now

Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles, heelies, or an office chair: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!

"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.

micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"

Feel free to also check out

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

How about just separate cars from pedestrians and bicycles?

Freeways outside busy city areas for just cars and no pedestrians or bicycles

City centers and busy foot traffic areas for pedestrians and bicycles only.

What do you think will happen if you mix fast moving two ton iron machines in the same space as people randomly walking around everywhere or on slower moving bicycles.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How about just separate cars from pedestrians and bicycles?

How would road crossings work? If those airbags are standard, I see it as a good thing. Subaru building bigger and heavier cars isn't though.

[–] litchralee 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In an urban core, there simply shouldn't be any roads (ie corridors for connectivity) that need to be crossed by pedestrians or bicyclists. Instead, the densest urban areas would have only streets (ie corridors for access) with human-scale and human-speed traffic, and public transport of course. Delivery and garbage trucks would operate off-peak at night, a la New York City

If there are to be roads, they need to be fully separated, with automobiles going above or below grade. After all, cars can climb grades with ease, hence why trenched or viaduct highways make more sense than those obnoxious, towering, loud, narrow, fenced-off so-called pedestrian overpasses.

Outside of the urban core, where roads should be, there's a better case for level crossing of pedestrian and bikes. To which point, the leading designs would be ones where so-called beg buttons are eliminated: the UK already demonstrates how automatic pedestrian and cyclist sensors work, and they have the benefit of also detecting if they finish crossing early; no need to hold road traffic longer than necessary. The Dutch have their own designs for detecting and yielding a crossing in advance of approaching cyclists.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

How about both?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Here in Sweden, we have plenty of excellent bicycle paths, yet even when there is a beautiful bicycle path going parallel to the big road, bikers insist on using the big road.

Ok, they have every right to use the roads just like any other vehicle, but I don't believe that it is wrong of me to get annoyed at a biker slowly going up a steep hill at 5kmh on a road where the limit is 70kmh when there is a bike path right next to the road going the same way.

If there isn't a bike path, then I don't get annoyed, they don't have a choice, but come on, if there is a bike path going parallel to the road, please use it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Please provide an example in street view or otherwise. I've seen lots of people make this claim that cyclists won't use cycle paths but every single time they provide an example it's plainly obvious why it's not being used. Bicycle infrastructure is frequently built to shockingly poor standards by people with a clear disdain of its users.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

If people are cycling on a road, the cyclepath must be strongly perceived as lower quality. Perhaps we need to focus on why so many people who cycle a lot feel the facilities created for motorists are far better than the ones created for cyclists

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Speaking as a cyclist: If I'm choosing to bike on the road with cars over using the cycletrack, then there is a problem with the cycletrack. I'd ask cyclists why they avoid it and improve that.

Off the top of my head I can think of several reasons why I sometimes choose to leave a bike lane to use the motor lanes.