this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
39 points (97.6% liked)
Fedigrow
1280 readers
177 users here now
To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks
Resources:
- https://lemmy-federate.com/ to federate your community to a lot of instances
- [email protected] to organize overall fediverse growth
- [email protected] to keep tabs on where new users might come from :)
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Megathreads:
- How (and when) to consolidate communities? (A guide)
- Where to request inactive or unmoderated communities? (A list)
Rules:
- Be respectful
- No bigotry
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Awesome! Are you planning to copy the rules from the sidebar as well, or start from scratch?
I've prepped one here. @[email protected], how does this look? I simplified the rules somewhat by combining related rules. Also I don't think the astronomy picture of the day was working so I removed it and kept the link
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Rules
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Related Communities
🔭 Science
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
Sidebar and rules look good! Daily active users are trending upwards.
You might want to consider posting on [email protected] (as an "under new management" post) and on [email protected]. I'd recommend spacing out the posts by a few days to reach more people.
Also, any idea what happened to Bee? Sal added Bee as a mod, Bee added you and Bitswap as mods, but now Bee's account and comments have vanished.
Yeah. Looks good. Thanks Otter!
One thing to think about is that recently we had a few requests to create a rule about quality sources. I was always torn about it. The post with links to bad sources/bad science brought out some of the highest engagement from the whole community and spurred some great educational dialogs.
I don't like the idea of keeping a disallowed list of sources. Nor do I like the idea of debating source quality.
I agree, at our current moderation capacity it would lead to inconsistent moderation and arguments about where the 'quality threshold' is
Encouraging people to post better quality sources through comments might be better than fully restricting the posts?