this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
118 points (94.7% liked)

Asklemmy

47425 readers
967 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] naught 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The gap exists between identical positions -- that's like the whole thing

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

https://www.payscale.com/research-and-insights/gender-pay-gap/

Idk if this is a good source, but if it is then how can you really point to generally .99 to every 1.00 as a really significant issue? If you want to say that women aren’t getting the same opportunities for better job positions then sure that’s probably generally true. However I don’t think you can legitimately say that the adjusted/controlled wage gap is that bad. At least there are many valid arguments for why the unadjusted/uncontrolled wage gap is bad.

[–] naught 2 points 2 days ago

I'm mistaken on that point then, though there is still a measurable gap. There is a large disparity in the "unadjusted" numbers which the article you sent notes is just as important as the adjusted one. It represents a power disparity. Ty for the correction

Here's another reliable source:
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/03/01/the-enduring-grip-of-the-gender-pay-gap/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's mostly because men, on average, negotiate for higher wages; if the women in such positions asked for higher wages, the disparity would be much lower.

[–] naught 4 points 2 days ago

This isn't true as I was mistaken. The gap apparently is 1 cent when adjusting for positions. I think this is an overly simplistic view which unduly shifts the blame to women, when in fact society and our economic systems push women towards particular jobs (or motherhood) and compensates far less.

Hers a source I linked elsewhere:

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/03/01/the-enduring-grip-of-the-gender-pay-gap/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Sure, but I feel that's for the same reason gay men earn more than straight men.