this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
112 points (100.0% liked)

World News

35624 readers
602 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/4484610

A French court found Marine Le Pen guilty Monday in an embezzlement case and followed up the verdict with a sentence barring her immediately from running for office for five years. Le Pen abruptly left the Paris courtroom before hearing how long she will be banned from running for public office.

Le Pen and 24 other officials from her National Rally were accused of having used money intended for European Union parliamentary aides to pay staff who worked for the party between 2004 and 2016, in violation of the 27-nation bloc’s regulations. Le Pen and her co-defendants deny wrongdoing.

The biggest concern for Le Pen was that the court may declare her ineligible to run for office preventing her from running for president in 2027 -- a scenario she had described as a “political death.”

The Constitutional Council ruled Friday, in a separate case, that imposing the punishment immediately was constitutional.

Full article

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So like... when you apply law selectively that's a problem. For example, Christine Lagarde was found guilty of involvement in a corrupt 400m euro arbitration, received no sentence, and was awarded with the ECB governor job. https://news.sky.com/story/court-finds-imf-chief-christine-lagarde-guilty-of-criminal-negligence-10702431

Then there's von der Leyen who simply refused to disclose text messages she exchanged with the chief executive of Pfizer https://www.ft.com/content/72f0cb12-3753-42a9-aba4-7b3fb596e1cd

There are plenty of such cases and these people never face any punishment, but all of a sudden in this case there's a sentence handed down. Anybody with even a minimally functioning brain can see that this is politically motivated lawfare. If the law is not applied equally then it's no longer just.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is because LePen is being condamned based on a law from 2016. (That she voted BTW)

The cases you mention here are older and cannot be judged through this law in France.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you think Le Pen is a unique case in France, I have a bridge to sell you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

She is not unique, nor is she the only one to have been condemned.