this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
116 points (97.5% liked)

UK Politics

3551 readers
109 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What a cunt

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Thank you for that information. I guess there isn't the simple solution of "tax the rich", because it's more nuanced than that?

So long as that red tape being removed isn't going to negatively affect the environment or anything like that?

[–] JasSmith 3 points 4 days ago

This is mostly targeted at NIMBYs who are worried about high density housing hurting their property values. There could very well be environmental impact, though that's not immediately clear. With so many people experiencing housing insecurity, I think the bigger issue right now for them is housing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

There are ways, but they'd be immensely unpopular with the corporate overlords, and thus, aren't an option.

God forbid they close loopholes to stop the exporting of profits to overseas entities, for example. Along with all the other ridiculous tax avoidance wheezes multinationals use to obfuscate their way out of paying their fair share, we could cover the welfare budget twice over and have change left.