this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1756 points (99.5% liked)

Work Reform

11252 readers
2380 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You literally did lie. You claimed I had been "provided sources" at a time when not a single source had been provided anywhere. That's called lying.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure someone else did, it's irrelevant because I provided links and you didn't bother to do any research you just discarded them by look alone. So again dumb or not arguing in good faith so you can drop the indignation as it's fairly stale.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No, they did not. You are lying when you say that, just like you were lying when you claimed it the first time.

Here's a link that proves every claim you made this whole conversation is wrong. It literally says on this page that, in this specific comment chain, nobody had provide a link to a source at the time you claimed they had. The link is: https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/

See, I can provide irrelevant links and lie about what they say just like you do.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No, they did not. You are lying when you say that, just like you were lying when you claimed it the first time.

Who cares?! You have them now and you're not bothering to use them because you don't care you'd rather just object to object.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I literally did use them and they didn't show anything you claimed they showed after I said they wouldn't and you doubled down that they did. I literally provided screenshots. Liar and troll.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

You already admitted you didn't, why lie now?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't at first, then I went back and did.

How do you think I got screenshots of the page without visiting the page, exactly? Please tell me, I'm fascinated to hear your explanation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah that's called inconsistency like I said.

The point isn't to screenshot it, it's too use the bar resources of the aflcio, nlrb and BLS websites which provide pretty literally any statistics you're curious about. Your laziness or inability to do research isn't my concern, I'm not your teacher so I'm just going to point you in the right direction and how you can figure it out on your own. You apparently can't or didn't and instead want everyone to do the leg work for you so all you have to do is find some increasingly idiotic reason to say "Nuh uh" and provide no counter evidence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You could've used any of the resources you mentioned to accesses the relevant statistics. Your laziness or inability to do research isn't my concern, I'm not your teacher. You apparently can’t or didn’t want to find the information and instead want everyone to do the leg work for you so all you have to do is find some increasingly idiotic reason to say “Nuh uh” and provide no counter evidence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You mean I could teach you how to do research but doing it for you. You won't learn if entering is just handed to you. Critical thinking and moderate motivation would a answer every question you've posed including your modified version you're claiming now.

As for the rest.

semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit

You take the negative you bear the burden of evidence.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You take the negative you bear the burden of evidence.

Correct! I asked a question, you said no, therefore you bear the burden of evidence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago

No you disagreed with the person a comment ahead then went on a tirade about people saying it's not "fucked up" which you can't evidence.