this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1011 points (99.5% liked)

Work Reform

11219 readers
1319 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iAmTheTot 188 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I love how one person cites a statistic, and another person just dismisses it as false because of their anecdotal experience.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

This is how most people think and see the world, which is why we (the US) are in the boat we're in now. People don't see the big picture if they never have to or aren't taught how to think critically.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's a complicated problem. To start with, the studies are usually paywalled. If you can afford to purchase access, you still need the capacity to understand and parse the formal academic language. Most people have neither of those requirements, and have to rely on the media to report the statistics accurately, which doesn't happen.

This leads to a situation where the media keeps trying to say, idk employment statistics are better than ever, and then everybody updates their mental blocklist to filter out the word 'statistics'.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago

Not to mention most issues are extremely nuanced and complex, not something that can be accurately broken down into 5 second sound bits.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Almost as of by design of corporate overlords and billionaires. Almost as of billions of dollars and collective hate can't fill the emptiness. Almost as if we should focus on healing everyone's (including billionaires ')wounded inner child schisms and social divides may start healing. Maybe

[–] [email protected] 55 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Sounds like every online platform ever.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

It was more like False, Source: this paper that says True.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago

Actually, that's not true at all. This one time, I met a guy who...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 hours ago

My thoughts exactly. And how I love this complete dismissal style with the "False." at the beginning, that has established itself online. it's a perfect giveaway for " now my personal but universal opinion, also called Truth bomb, is going to destroy your statement" - which in my opinion is just extremely patronizing and never really true.

Especially when comparing your personal anecdotal experience with a fucking statistic.

Oh and nobody talks like that in real life, or at least the people that do start their verbal line of argument this way are idiots and everybody knows it.