this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
-79 points (9.3% liked)

Games

17984 readers
749 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
-79
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/games
 

The decline of the Steam games platform is inevitable, and there are already warning signs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, no. Valve has all but ensured their continuing relevance with the Steam Deck alone. Coupled with their consumer-focused policies (like forcing companies to disclose kernel-level anti-cheat), they're not going anywhere.

This is just a Mac fanboi who's salty that Mac support is poor, even though it's Apple that has made their walled garden hard to work with.

I do worry a little about future antitrust actions, because while I generally like Valve as they are, Gabe won't be around forever. They have a giant influence in the market, and they don't even have to try (they were one of the first, so it makes sense they'd have the most market share); it could be that the company I generally like starts actively being anticompetitive or starts donating to Nazis or something.

But that is a problem for a future time, and there's no denying that Valve has propelled Linux gaming into mainstream relevance. No matter what happens, I'll always be grateful for that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

I do worry a little about future antitrust actions, because while I generally like Valve as they are, Gabe won’t be around forever. They have a giant influence in the market, and they don’t even have to try (they were one of the first, so it makes sense they’d have the most market share); it could be that the company I generally like starts actively being anticompetitive or starts donating to Nazis or something.

Agreed, if there's one potential weak point... it's basically that valve is the 15 years ago google of gaming right now. Great support for open source and linux... mostly good policies (minus maybe their micro transaction and lack of cracking down on how say the CSGO skins feed an underage gambling industry).

But yeah, effectively we still have the worse of positions that, one bad management choice, and we could all lose access to all the games we've purchased from them over the last decade or 2.