this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
871 points (97.7% liked)

politics

20563 readers
3997 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 256 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

I'm not convinced there will be an election in 2028...

[–] [email protected] 55 points 17 hours ago

There will, but it won't be a fair one. They have "elections" in Russia, too.

[–] earphone843 97 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

There won't at the current trajectory. There won't even be midterms.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

I remember Republicans checking out on elections back in 2018 because they bought hard into the Trump "elections are rigged" propaganda. The GOP lost seven Senate seats that year as conservative turnout plunged.

I wonder if Democrats will make the same mistake in 2026.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 18 hours ago

No, I don't think Democrats are ready to make new mistakes yet. They still won't abandon their devotion to the old mistakes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Shouldn't be hard. All they have to say is "Remember the townhalls, and how they mocked you while you paid for them to make your lives worse? We'll put it back." They don't even need to add anything, just try to rebuild. Anything would be a positive change when you're sliding into the negative side of the scale (and in two years, it'll be far far far to the left)

[–] knobbysideup 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They made it in 2024. The results of abstaining or protest voting were obvious, and these idiots did it anyway. And here we are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

The results of abstaining or protest voting were obvious

Absolutely. The current Dem leadership is now wildly unpopular and vulnerable to primary. Just like after 2016, the seeds have been planted for a big anti-incumbent wave.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure about rigged, but honestly, depending on how the next few years go, it may be straight up dangerous for non-republican Americans to vote. While that's by no means a certainty, people should keep an eye on any electoral changes made in their state.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

If Republicans experience a route like they suffered in 2018, it will likely be due to the mushy indie republican-when-its-convenient voters breaking ranks in droves, just like they did in prior Dem wave years. That's what Harris was banking on in 2024 when she paraded around her pet RINOs Liz Cheney and Jeff Flake. She just failed to understand that these wishy-washy voters are chasing less war and less disruption and more protectionist economics, something Trump was able to dangle over their heads (twice!) to win the GOP primary / national election.

Republicans don't really seem to get it, either. Which is why they think the midterm after a wave year is the perfect time to put Grade A psychos all over the down-ballots and end up losing statewide in Alabama of all places as a result.

The "we won't be having any more elections" crowd is heavily invested in a theory that Republicans can get their own base to sit down, shut up, and follow orders. But the last eight years of Trump should be an indication of the exact opposite. The party is being lead by the base, which means the prior generation's power brokers like the Bushs and Cheneys and Bloombergs no longer have a place in it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago

This line of thinking has preserved whatever is left of my optimism. Let us hope my fellow Americans continue to function predictably.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

I wonder if Democrats will make the same mistake in 2026.

i really, really fucking hope this doesnt happen, i'm going to fucking lose my shit if it does. Because unless things change, it's not looking great for the trump midterms right now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

Look, guys. I'm rather concerned that the states that haven't seceded by then won't even have electricity anymore.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

Even Russia has elections

[–] [email protected] 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There will absolutely be an election.

It will be a farce, a Russian election where there's only one possibility to win.

If we're not pitchforks in the street before then, I don't hold much hope

[–] [email protected] 22 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Or maybe a Hungary-style election where the entire media landscape shills for the ruling class and people on social media are bombarded with misinformation and one-sided reporting.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 18 hours ago

sounds a lot like the last 12 years TBF

[–] [email protected] 12 points 18 hours ago

Sounds like you described the US process as well. May not be far from it now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

Certainly could never happen here, twice at least. /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The one thing we have going for us is that Don's dementia and age are going to increasingly make it difficult for him to hold his party together. And there is the chance one of those things will leave the GOP trying to field a new traitor to try and get the cult to consolidate around.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

once he kicks the bucket, assuming they can't find someone the republican base will support as fervently as trump, the entire party is done for, it will collapse into a blackhole of nothingness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I'd like to believe that, I really would, but let's be honest with ourselves. The current republicans (in leadership) aren't stupid. They've gotten pretty decent at running with donald's bullshit and spinning it. They also know that politics isn't much different than sports teams for the vast majority of the voting public in america. They'll not have trouble finding someone who is charismatic enough to spit verbal acid at opponents in a primary AND can be riled up against the demographic target of choice.

The only real challenge for them will be 1.) finding someone with donald's 'blessing' or a connection to him to set it up as 'taking over' so the republican voters will find it so amazing, AND 2.) ensuring someone like musk doesn't try to torpedo everything by using vast amounts of money to try to buy their way into the ring.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Just like the dems. Who will we vote for then, the greens?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There will be since elections are held at the state level. Many won't be free or fair in the red states, but they'll be good in the blue states.

If red states don't hold elections, that's fewer electoral college votes we need to win the presidency and we wouldn't win in red states anyway.

Please, Texas and Florida. Oh, please, don't hold elections. 🙏

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The way I read it, electoral college votes are the one thing where individual states can somewhat easily cancel elections for President, as long as they do so before the election. States have broad discretion over the appointment of electors. All states currently appoint them based on the results of elections, but the rules around that are all set by State legislation, and can be reset by States as well. The only Federal requirement is that the rules don't change after any election is held.

Prior Supreme Courts have ruled that things like the Equal Protection clause may be used to challenge any act where the legislature restricts voting rights once they have been granted. But who knows what this clown Court would make of that.

Congressional elections, on the other hand, must be held in order for those seats to be filled. So any state that unilaterally cancels elections across the board will be sending nobody to Congress (and likely any expired Senate terms as well). Some states may go the extra mile and cancel the election for President, but not for Congress. We'll see how that turns out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

Nah, there probably will. Whoever is taking control of the US really don't care about MAGA's and 3rd terms. They'll just put another puppet there, the new way of doing things in post-capitalism still maintains and some people will continue to get increasingly very rich doesn't matter who the prez is. We finally reached "the future".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

There will definitely be an attempt to eliminate or "postpone" them. I'm certain Trump is looking at Putin in power and other governments in a state of war without elections as inspiration.