Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
If you don't have the nerve to hold a stock for 30 years through ups, downs, crashes and rebuilds, there's a thing called a high yield savings account that may better fit your current stage of life better and risk tolerance.
And let's all point to the sign:
If Trump's antics can make you sell, you should sell right now and not buy back in, because that's money you should not have invested in the first place - by your own standards for peace of mind.
President Trump is far from the first or the last powerful person to wield massive global power that negatively affects the markets. Markets perform with strong returnsin spite of bullshit from world leaders, not because any world leaders are particularly competent (with some very rare exceptions).
It is scary right now. It really is. But that's what investing is about. We risk some money we don't need right now, in hope of some growth later. Pulling out when things are going down is statistically a guarantee to lock in losses. But peaceful sleep at night beats 2%-20% growth.
To answer your question: absolutely. Stocks are going to spend four or more years underperforming where they could have under better leadership. As they have done before, and as they will do again. That's pretty much been true with every president during my lifetime, though, and through most of recorded history. Hindsight is 20/20, and all that. And anyway, democracies don't, so far, tend to elect economists.
All of your advice about investing is the same advice given to people going into a casino.
Valid point. Only the historic odds of winning are really different.
While this is usually true, I personally am discovering that I may need to liquidate all my stocks to pay for an escape plan. If the stock market crashes, that will change what I can do to escape.
Usually, the recommendation is to have an emergency fund before you make investments. If you foresaw the potential need for an emergency plan, you could've bumped up that emergency fund up.
Of course, if your situation is unique and not "I need to escape Trump/a Red state" (like suddenly needing to escape from an abusive situation), then that's much harder to anticipate.
An emergency fund is generally ~6-12 months of expenses. I recently migrated from the USA to Germany, which cost me about 30 months worth of expenses, all told. It could be done more cheaply, but there’s also a huge element of luck, so it would not be smart to assume that it will cost much less than 24 months worth of expenses.
That's a fair point. I live in a high cost of living area, so relocating myself internationally as a single individual (without needing to pay for a storage locker or anything) was easily covered by less than 3 months worth of living costs. Maybe even 2 months would've gotten me change back. But I wasn't moving too much stuff...
Anyways, you're right. Relocation can cost a lot more than a standard emergency fund depending on one's circumstances.
Tbh, it wasn’t even moving a lot of things (though I did bring my cat), just that unexpected things came up.
Opening a local bank account took, I shit you not, eleven weeks. From when I made the first appointment to when I got my visa, it took almost eight months, during which time my prospective job fell through (reasonably). My first landlord is still holding on to my security deposit and nearly evicted me with no notice (because of said cat, whose presence I negotiated before moving in) it’s not legal to do that at all here, but they were betting that a foreigner wouldn’t know the laws.
I was in a fortunate position and I had a lot of savings, but it was still really expensive to be able to be adaptable
What would qualify as a “high yield” savings account or money market in your book? High yield savings accounts unfortunately adjust to market interest rates.
"High yield savings account" is a specific product you can ask for at your credit union (or bank, if you're a sucker).
A high yield savings account carries rules about how often you can move money in and out of it, but is still FDIC insured (in the US).
FDIC insurance means that if the market completely crashes and your credit union shuts down, ~~the Federal Reserve prints new money to replace your deposits~~, your money is returned to you out of previously paid insurance deposits up to like $250,000.00.
It is widely believed to carry much lower risk, and so pays much lower interest, than average stock market performance of an index fund.
But if giving up 3% means sleeping well at night, it can be the best call. Everyone's situation is different.
Edit: and high yield savings accounts historically perform much better than the average confused/frightened active investor who only buys during high markets and always sells during low markets.
This is not correct. The FDIC is self-funded through risk-based insurance premiums paid by the banks.
https://www.fdic.gov/resources/deposit-insurance/deposit-insurance-fund
Good correction. Thanks.
Thanks for this.
No one listen to this guy. There is zero need to be prepared to hold a stock for 30 years.
There is a tax penalty for selling stocks at a year, but only on the profits.
Never sell because a stock is down during a market down turn. Sell or buy on the position's potential value.
Profit is made when you buy a stock, not when you sell. You only buy stock from a company you have researched and genuinely believe has long term potential. Things like this shouldn't be altering your perception of the stock.
I'm paraphrasing but that was a major point in "common stocks and uncommon profits" by Philip Fisher.
What? You make a profit when you sell it for more than you paid for it. Any growth before the sale is unrealized gains.
Thanks for explaining how profits work lmao
Saying you make your profit when you buy the stock means you have a clear plan on when you'll be selling the stock. A dip in your stocks is an opportunity to buy, not to sell.
You can have a great company, but if the government decides it's illegal or something, then that's still a problem.
Ofcourse, and stocks might fall over the short term, but thoroughly vetted companies have a much higher probability of bouncing back. Diversification and thorough vetting at the time of buying is what experts recommend, not panic selling.