this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
226 points (93.5% liked)

Games

33824 readers
2011 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 91 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I’m honestly surprised that Slack doesn’t have some kind of steganographic watermarking so that leaked screenshots can be traced back to the original user, given how many big companies use it for all their internal comms.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

These companies can barely make the basics work on their apps, let alone all of this

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Even so, they're going find this person fast. ABK staff just has to cross reference all the participants of leaked meetings

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

If this person is like every other online chud they'll find him before they finish cross referencing chat attendees.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I see you don't use slack at work. Everyone is in every channel all the time for no reason. It's madness.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I did use slack; we had general channels with tons of people and smaller channels/meeting rooms with 5-30 people. If it was a 5-30 channel they can be found.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Only if that channel was private. You don't have to join a channel to be able to read its contents.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Oh what the fuck. I don't believe Teams is that way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

There are public and private channels, simple as.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Just one of the reasons that Teams is horrible to use!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

The reason is that it's great for collaboration and sharing info

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The techniques you're thinking of are for documents sent by email or some such. You add innocuous whitespace or typos that are unique to each one, and send them individually. If one leaks, you can match it to the employee who received it. That doesn't work for screenshots of Slack.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well you could make it work, for example some random pattern in chat backgrounds that trace back to whoever is the user. That would still show up in a screenshot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Slack or the OS would need to support it directly, and I don't think either of those have it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

True, but that's why the original comment seemed surprised, that a service like Slack doesn't have this given how many corporations use it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Christ I got added to this for college, such a mess of an app. Really difficult to follow what is what on it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

It's really not. Depends on how your structure it I suppose