this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
605 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39971 readers
2976 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

In a Fox News interview, Donald Trump argued that Ukraine should not have resisted Russia’s 2022 invasion, claiming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy should have made a deal with Vladimir Putin.

Trump criticized Zelenskyy for choosing to fight, compared the military strength of Russia and Ukraine, and said he could have ended the war quickly through negotiations.

Trump’s stance contrasts with Joe Biden's strong support for Ukraine, including aid and sanctions on Russia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In case anyone is thinking of taking this troll seriously, there is no treaty that prevents NATO from expanding east. There was something like it between NATO and the USSR but Russia officially is not the successor to USSR so they have no claim to that guarantee. It's all Russian propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Officially, they are the USSR successor state; they received the USSR's seat on the UN security council.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Okay. This is a bit more nuanced and what I gave was my opinion, as in they're not the successor. They are the successor in some cases, but whether they're actually the successor or not depends on which option is beneficial to Russia. When it comes to NATO Russia likes to act like it's the successor, but when it comes to reparations for the atrocities the USSR committed that's when Russia says they're not actually the successor to the USSR and can't be responsible for the atrocities committed by the USSR. I'm my eyes you can't have it both ways and as such I'm just taking cues from the Russian playbook. Whatever guarantees were given they were given to the USSR and not Russia, especially when those guarantees were never on paper.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There was something like it between NATO and the USSR but Russia officially is not the successor to USSR so they have no claim to that guarantee.

Like, if you seriously believe that, you should check your reasoning skills.

This isn't the ship of theseus. Not everything was exchanged. USSR changed one small thing which is its name and became Russia, that does not invalidate all prior agreements.

[–] Danquebec 12 points 3 days ago

USSR dissolved in 1991 when its last member state, Khazakstan, left. Russia, which had left the union prior, found itself with a lot of nuclear warheads. Other ex-member states agreed to hand the nukes they had to Russia. Having nuclear weapons and having the means to maintain them and launch them, Russia naturally joined the Security Council in 1991.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So why isn't Russia taking responsibilities for the atrocities and illegal occupations done by the USSR? It's as if it's not just a name change.

Also what agreement do you think gives Russia that guarantee? There's no paper that says NATO won't expand east.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Which empires actually gave reparations to former countries though? Sadly Russia doesn't seem to do worse than the rest of the world in this area

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Russia's not taking responsibility for the atrocities and illegal occupations done by Russia.