this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
50 points (96.3% liked)

Games

17967 readers
528 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I tried to read that article. You'll notice that the end of my message refers to the Steam rating system, which is mentioned towards the end (or at least I think it was the end) of that article. Problem is, this site is utter fucking shite, and most of it was obscured with scrolling tracking ads as I always trying to read. So yes, I missed the part about it just being a form to fill.

As for "official", yes, I know PEGI/ESRB/Whatever are industry-controlled. But for better of for worse, they're still used as reference, and they're third party (though clearly not that independent). It's still different from declaring yourself what your game contains.

[–] tja 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You should look at using an ad blocker. I had no problems with the site

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, well I tend to give sites I don't know the benefit of the doubt, which is why I don't ad-block by default. Now I know this one doesn't deserve to exist at all.

[–] tja 5 points 2 months ago

That's of course also a valid way to look at it