this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
686 points (96.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12851 readers
938 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 101 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

But Mexico has 63 more miles of coastline on the Gulf than the USA does. We should just leave it alone.

Wouldn't surprise me if this was inspired to circumvent the new ban on oil drilling Biden just enacted. "We're drilling in the Gulf of America, not the Gulf of Mexico."

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

The US doesn't have exclusive rights to "America" as a name. In fact strictly speaking "Gulf of America" is not a bad name since it is the largest gulf in the Americas AFAIK.

[–] [email protected] 98 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is, of course, not why Trump is doing this.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

The reason is racism

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Then maybe “Gulf of the Americas” would be more appropriate.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

True, they'll probably call it Gulf of 'MURICA!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The US doesn't have exclusive rights to "America" as a name.

Agreed. Let's also change our demonym to Unitedstatian.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That’s also unclear, given the United States of Mexico.

Edit: I guess we could do Columbian, but I gotta assume Colombia would be annoyed and it’s not exactly descriptive of our foreign policy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You joke but in many languages they do that, for instance "statunitensi" or "estadounidenses"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I don't joke actually. I chose "Unitedstatians" exactly because that's what other languages do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Except America has more then one gulf so it isn't the gulf of America it is one gulf in America.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Canada has more land mass than the US does. Perhaps Trump should be talking about integrating the US into Canada (and doing away with the now-redundant US Presidential position).

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I’m sure Canada would love that influx of crazy

[–] jaemo 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Cascadia, the one envisioned as a racist white ethnostate?

What the fuck is wrong with you?

[–] jaemo 0 points 2 weeks ago

No, the geographic region you fucking mouth breather.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was born and raised in Cascadia and I have never once heard of it being some white racist ethnostate it's more of a bioregion/cool people thing...I googled it and it looks like some folk in the 1840s wanted to do that but comparing us with them is ridiculous on your part to tell ya the truth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I have never once heard of it being some white racist ethnostate

I was raised all over the country - but got an education in history. I've known the chud's plan for Cascadia since I was a kid. Why don't you read history? Don't you think you should know what you're endorsing before you start suggesting people support a plan for a white racist ethnostate?

Now that you know it's history are you in any way reconsidering?

It's not just a historical motivation, the scumfucks are still pushing for it.

https://www.cascadepbs.org/2015/07/hate-filled-zone-a-group-of-white-racists-wants-a-nw-secession-a-vile-dream-with-deep-historic-roots

https://thebaffler.com/latest/cascadia-lokting

https://www.kuow.org/stories/i-went-undercover-seattle-s-white-nationalist-group/

wake up

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

But Mexico has 63 more miles of coastline on the Gulf than the USA does.

USA != America. USA is a country that resides on the North American Continent.

While I know Trump is doing this to try and claim it as the USA's... It actually makes sense if you actually use "America" properly to refer to North, Central and South America.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But Mexico has 63 more miles of coastline on the Gulf than the USA does.

He'll solve that too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

We'll croatia them and canada.