this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
418 points (98.4% liked)

UK Politics

3156 readers
134 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It is an unprecedented case. And it risks triggering an unprecedented threat to journalism. The UK police have repeatedly tried to obtain the passwords to the phones of the British independent journalist, Richard Medhurst, the first reporter arrested in London under Section 12: his analyses and comments on Israel’s bloodbath in Gaza – which Amnesty International has characterised as genocide – have been interpreted by the police as support for organisations banned from the UK, such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

The British journalists’ union, the NUJ, and the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) publicly condemned his arrest and the use of anti-terrorism laws against journalists “simply for carrying out their work”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 93 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you search his name, you'll see exactly zero big news orgs covering this story. BBC, Reuters, AFP, every British newspaper, all notable by their absence. Why? This is A Story, right?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

There are a few reasons this can happen.

Super Injunction (sometimes self applying). But these tend to be used for privacy issues.

Unverifiable sources (which is why jumping to assuming a gag order is sometimes premature)

And it's possible that the major outlets are trying to prepare reports in a watertight way. Or that part of the story just hasn't been proven/released yet.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'd like one of these to be the reason, but I see no evidence to support it.
Super injunction - as you say, usually used for privacy issues, unlikely to apply here and if it is the case, then the other, smaller, news orgs covering the story would be in trouble.
Unverifiable sources - the IFJ is a rock solid source. Even if it weren't, then this claim would assume that the news orgs that have published are all guilty of cowboy journalism.
Watertightness - for the Panama papers, yes. For this small story, no way. It's A Story, and it's the journalist's job to get copy out as quickly as possible.
As I said I'd like it if any of these were the case and thanks for pointing them out as I certainly hadn't thought of them when I wrote my comment, but I'm still just not seeing it. It seems like a decision has been made not to pursue this story, but I'm not jumping to conclusions as to why. It's hard to keep the faith though, when there are zero major outlets reporting on it, which means that decision not to pursue has been made multiple times by multiple different editors. WTF

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

According to the article the British Journalist Union condemned the arrest.

Medhurst openly supports Palestinian armed resistance. Which is probably why the big newspapers do not report on him.