this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
1299 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

5603 readers
555 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the fcc has derived powers

the faa has derived powers

the sec has derived powers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What constitutionally derived powers do those executive agencies have in a judicial action?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh you want to move the goals posts from "derived powers" to "judicial action" ?

neat trick.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The injustice I described was the conviction of the accused. None of the agencies described have any constitutional powers relevant to such an injustice. There was no "moving of the goal posts": The agencies described are not relevant to the original scope.

You could make a good argument that the presiding judge and appellate courts also have some constitutional powers, however, the "separation of powers" drastically limits their ability to review legislated law. They can overturn legislated law on the basis of constitutionality, but they do not have the constitutional power to overturn a legislated law merely on the basis of irrationality or absurdity, as that is a legislative function and not a judicial one.

The juror is not restricted in this manner. The juror is free to determine that the legislators did not consider the specific circumstances of the accused when they prohibited the act for which the accused is charged. The juror is free to overrule the legislature on a case-by-case basis.