this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
51 points (96.4% liked)

Ask Science

8756 readers
2 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it just a matter of not being worth it? I see cooling towers releasing what appears to be a ton of steam, pretty high up. If that steam were captured at the top and allowed to condense, wouldn't that result in a ton of water with a lot of gravitational potential energy? That water could then be released and used to power water turbines. Maybe I'm overestimating the amount of water being released as steam, or underestimating how much is needed to spin a water turbine to get a meaningful result, but it seems like wasted energy to me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They don't release that much as steam, though.

The majority of water discharged from nuclear plants is cooling water, which stays in liquid form the whole way. It's just rather warmer on the way out than in.

[–] kersploosh 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I went looking for some number for fun. (Every work day needs a good distraction, right?)

The nuclear plant that provides some of my electricity supposedly intakes 24 million gallons of water per day. As far as I can tell, that is entirely to make up for cooling water that is released as steam. There is a lot more cooling water present in the system which is recaptured and reused.

24M gallons/day = 16,667 gallons/minute. That's a significant amount of water. However, it's several orders of magnitude less than the flow through the smaller hydro power dams in my area. A few that I looked at have average turbine discharges in the ballpark of 6,000,000 gallons/min.

So for the cost (and vast regulatory headaches) of adding a secondary generation unit onto a nuclear cooling tower, you can just dam a nearby river and get 360x the energy.

Edit: I was way off on that 24M gallon/day number. After more reading, it looks like only around 2% of that water becomes steam leaving the cooling towers. So condensing the steam would give us a flow rate of 333 gallons/min of liquid water. That's barely enough flow to operate a water slide at a theme park, let alone generate significant electricity through a turbine.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They are not evaporating 24M gallons a day. Most of that will be returned to the body of water it is pulled from but a few degrees warmer. There's strict limits on how much the plant can warm a river or lake because of concerns about killing fish so plants will have cooling towers in parallel.

[–] kersploosh 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

That makes a lot more sense. I thought the number seemed huge, but everything I could find said they have closed-loop cooling at this particular facility.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

More importantly, if water is in steam form it still has pressure (and therefore energy).

Nuclear power plants are designed to cool down (aka capture) as much energy as possible before releasing the water back into the wild.