this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
495 points (96.3% liked)
Technology
59979 readers
3234 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean I'm usually not the skeptic when it comes to privacy rights, but it's hard for me to defend against an action like this. Because I don't see a purpose of needing that information outside of the intent to sell to third party
Social media are more and more required by law to prevent kids from using their service. I don't see a way to achieve that with no risks to privacy.
Then there shouldn't be such laws. It's not the government's job to parent.
won't somebody please think of the children!
Which is why the laws suck. Don't fix a stupid law with stupid policy, fix the stupid law.
I couldn't imagine an AI model will be very accurate of being able to identify a 11 year old vs a 13 year old. I assume this is more to try and vett whether they can access NSFW channels or not, but honestly since humans can't properly vett that, I don't know how an AI is supposed to reliably do that.