this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
355 points (95.2% liked)

Android

17801 readers
96 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: [email protected]


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: [email protected]

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: [email protected]

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to [email protected].

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to [email protected].

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (5 children)

No mention of the DAC quality of any of the models. I’d hope the Sony one is decent.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

I got the Xperia 1 VI, the headphone port seriously lacks power. It's like half of what i'd expect from a phone. They might have bent a knee to some EU regulation. All my older cheaper phones could drive my larger cans, this one doesn't leave much headroom.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Sony

Can't trust them ever again. Had an XZ Premium, and they took away Miracast in an update.

And I'm still not over them taking away Linux support on the PS3....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I can't speak on the xperia 1 vi, but I have the 1 iii and the DAC is great.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

One of the reasons I'm using an lg g8 as a Digital audio player

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is that a big concern in 2024? Devices are much more powerful and audio is cheap and easy.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You’d be surprised. Good quality compact DACs are very expensive unless the manufacturer engineers a better version.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Are they though?

This isn't the 90's. All it needs to do us produce an analog stream.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It depends entirely on the quality of the drivers in the headphones and the listener. Portable USB DACs for audiophiles run upwards of $200.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes but they have much, much , much wider margins than cell phone manufacturers. Yes, phone manufacturers will add a $0.1 DAC/AMP chip instead of a $2 because of profit margins in the 100k unit range. The actual DAC IC chips that are very good are not too expensive. The metal housings are literally more expensive. It is not expensive at all to put a good chip in there, it is all the bean counters saying that they have to increase quarterly profits.

Plus "audiophile" DACs are literally 80% snakeoil. Because listening is so subjective, they heavily rely on audiophiles' quest for placebo effect and after-purchase self justification, both of which are a strong phenomenon. Above a FIIo E10k (literally uses a PCM5102, which is very cheap ), you get massive diminishing returns. Then above the ~150 or 200 mark, they all use very similar chips and just play around a bit with distortion on DAC/AMP stacks. Without distortion, there is no discernable difference between them.

I was a signal integrity engineer for years, we can cleanly convert signals in the MHz range (>25x faster than audio signals) and process signals in the >5GHz range. Audio is literally child's play to have near zero noise and 99% perfect analog conversion... Even a product I am working on now where the audio is medically needed to be a certain delay and fidelity to trigger biometric measurement feedback, the DAC chip is extremely cheap compared to "audiophile" gear....

There is a reason why pretty much everyone fails a blind DAC comparison. If there were double-blind tests performed, probably like <1% of the audiophile population (that is already very low) that has extremely abnormal hearing would be able to tell DACs apart consistently above a fairly low threshold.

[–] southsamurai 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It isn't so much power because that's cheap and easy. It's the hardware processing the data. A DAC is what decides whether or not sound is clear at any given volume, and the cheaper ones have a tendency to distort or otherwise suck as volume increases

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That sounds like a dated idea. Modern hardware shouldn't have any issues creating an audio stream.

[–] southsamurai 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I mean, there's a difference in DACs. Creating one is pretty universal afaik, but they're not all created equal.

I have an old lgg7 that sounds great out of the box. My main phone, however, is a cheap oneplus, and it's meh, but when I plug in an external DAC, the sound improves detectably, even to my old ears.

My kid's phone is some random nokia and sounds like crap, even through my best headphones, at high volume. Plug in the DAC, clear.

It's a thing. The on board DAC limits how volume affects sound quality for sure, and some don't even need the volume up to start having audible breaks and distortion.

Now, some of that is android. Crappy devices benefit from a player that has its own audio processing. You fiddle around in poweramp in particular, and you can usually get things to where it's clear enough to be bearable at high volume. But there's still a limit if the DAC isn't solid. But a device that has a great DAC won't have the issue at all unless you go crazy with the eq, which is possible on any hardware or software.

My g7, maxed out, is clear as a bell at any volume, so long as the source file is good. Same with the external DAC. Both are true regardless of using the headphone jack or usbC for output, with headphones or a system (home or auto).