Fediverse

28688 readers

775 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Do you think the mostly limited range of political views is a strength or a weakness of Lemmy? (For example, in terms of attracting new users.) (feddit.nl)

submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

221 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sure, there are always outliers and you can correct me if I'm wrong, but that's just the overall impression I have.

(I wasn't sure if [email protected] or this community would fit better for this kind of question, but I assume it fits here.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Removed Comment I am gratified by the rate of downvotes on this. Greta Thunberg would, I think, be disappointed and angry that anyone would take what she said as a justification for ways to help get Trump elected. Let me highlight the very clearly written part that you seem to have missed: > It is probably Impossible to overestimate the consequences this specific election will have for the world and for the future of humanity. > > There is no doubt that one of the candidates — Trump — is way more dangerous than the other. If you want real positive change, listen to Greta and fight for change outside the system. If you want third parties, support RCV and proportional representation, to make them viable. If you want the end of the fucking world, then don’t vote, or vote for spoiler candidates within the current system that makes them unelectable. Edit: Formatting by [email protected]

reason: Electoralism, liberalism

well you did kinda invade their safe space with common sense ideas, shit lord hehe

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This moderator behavior here is exactly what you'd see on reddit lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

"We're anarchists."

"Cool. Here's an urgent problem I see for the world that I think we should work on."

"SHIT COCK GET OUT DISALLOWED We don't say that here. You're receiving a gentle ban, to think about what you've done. Be better."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

Oh my god... This is spot on. I feel like everyone here is mostly larping.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

That's the current modding situation across any community focused on working class politics... as if people running them are not interested in helping the peasants.

Why would anyone act like that on social media... for free at that