this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
712 points (98.8% liked)

News

23367 readers
2616 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump’s transition team has bypassed standard FBI background checks for key cabinet nominees, relying instead on private investigators, as reported by CNN.

This breaks decades-old norms meant to vet candidates for criminal history and conflicts of interest.

Controversial appointees include Matt Gaetz (attorney general), Tulsi Gabbard (director of national intelligence), and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (health secretary), all facing scrutiny for past investigations, pro-Russian views, or personal admissions.

Critics argue Trump seeks to undermine traditional vetting, with potential security risks tied to bypassing these checks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 230 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How much corruption can we take before he's even installed? For real. This is way fucken nuttier than last time. It seems so malicious.

[–] [email protected] 129 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We will take whatever he gives. The US voters approved him. They want this. They chose this, and everything that comes from it.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This. There is no authority above the authoritarian. His word is law now. Whatever Our Glorious Cheeto wishes is now US doctrine.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I tried. I can't do anything.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you check your pockets for a time machine? I bet you left it there and could make a quick pop back to the 90s and correct the timeline.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, there'd be plenty of that

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Thats not true. There are at least 71 million people here who voted against it. Thats a lot of people.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He won the popular vote, and the electoral college. Majority rules. (Unfortunately)

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also people who didn't vote at all, are at minimum fine with Trump and not against him.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

...Assuming he actually did, and didn't just commit all the electoral fraud he kept talking about

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

There is that…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Plenty of voter suppression in swing states, like unenrolling people from voter registration lists. Also the ongoing issues like 4 hour lines in urban areas, due to not enough voting facilities and machines, and short or no lines in rural areas and suburbs. Also, how it’s easier for people with certain types of jobs to go vote but hourly workers etc have a harder time getting there since voting day isn’t a holiday.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There were even more who couldn't be bothered to get off their asses and vote at all. They stood by and allowed this to happen without caring enough to try and stop it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I have a friend who says “I’m not political” and I’m just what? So you don’t have any opinion on whether immigrants should get fucked or gay people should have rights? His position is “I see so many families and friends torn apart by disagreements so I’m just not political”. Okay. It makes me think he’s kind of a dolt. I don’t feel like it’s possible to not have an opinion on social issues at the least.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is why we’re supposed to have separation of powers. Any competent senate, even if the same party would insist in this before confirming. A senate full of sycophants on the other hand ….

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He got more votes than he ever did in the previous elections, and won the popular vote for the first time. God damn.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I’m not even sure what world be the worse outcome, more fraud and cheating from Trump or that so many people genuinely voted for him.

Sadly my gut tells me that real votes are the worse situation, and also the true one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Yup. There will be lots of opportunities to say “well, I hope you didn’t vote for trump if you wanted ______”

Healthcare, retirement, any kind of social service, etc etc.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It seems so malicious.

I guess he was being honest about all that revenge talk, eh? I mean, it is actively and onerously malicious, but just like last time, everyone's just gonna let Trump steamroll them, because the federal government has long had hesitance to hold figures like presidents, senators, and supreme court justices to account, and this is just an extension of that.

I mean, we didn't prosecute Bush and Cheney for war crimes. Hillary Clinton was proud of her friendship with Henry Kissinger. Kamala Harris was proud of her endorsement by Dick Cheney.

"It's a big club and we ain't in it," but Trump and co. don't feel the need to put up the facade anymore.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“It’s a big club and we ain’t in it,” but Trump and co. don’t feel the need to put up the facade anymore.

Bingo. Instead of "hiring" (paying off) politicians, they're just doing it themselves. They've lost any and all care about keeping up appearances. After all, what are we going to do? Sue them?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

the federal government has long had hesitance to hold figures like presidents, senators, and supreme court justices to account, and this is just an extension of that.

Because if they start holding others in similar offices to account, they might have to hold themselves as well, and that ain't happening.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The 4 years of Trumpsanity isn't starting in January, it's starting right now. For fucks sake, I'm not ready yet. I need to start stockpiling popcorn and booze. Except this time I'll probably need less popcorn and more booze because I don't think it's going to be as stupid funny as last time. It's already not funny, it's been nosediving into "could it get any worse?" and so far the answer has been "Yes!".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It annoys me a lot when people I know say “Trump is funny”. Not really… he’s a whiny, conceited asshole. He might be somewhat amusing if he wasn’t the President. As it is, this isn’t funny at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump himself wasn't funny, but he would come across as funny because he would say the stupidest things or act in an unprofessional way. For example when he said the experts should look into if showing light inside a human body would kill COVID or maybe injecting disinfectant might work, that was stupid funny. There were others like the "who knew healthcare is so complicated" statement

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It’s funny in a way but still horrifying since someone that narcissistic and ignorant is in charge of the government.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

He called Putin for a reason