this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
702 points (98.9% liked)
Greentext
4391 readers
1172 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
OP is working for a huge corporation, so slacking off and getting paid for that is ethical.
I'd go even one step further and say that slacking off is more ethical than actually working in that situation.
depends on what huge organization it is
Organizations don't get big from kindness.
Red cross, EPA, and FDA are all large organizations imo. Definitely outliers, but theyy do exist and I wouldn't consider it ethical to take their money without working.
I would absolutely consider it ethical to take money from the american red cross without working.
The EPA and FDA didn't get big from kindness.
Tf part of Lemmy did I find myself in?
The thread you are replying to is discussing whether or not it can ever be more ethical to not slack off at work while working for a large organization.
Given that context, your comment can be taken as you saying there is no such large organization that is more ethical to not slack off at work for, as there is no large organization that is kind.
I am providing examples of large organizations that I find more ethical to not slack off while working for. I was not trying to provide examples of large organizations that are kind.
Big subgenius energy in anon's post.
The subgenius MUST have slack!