this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
897 points (98.9% liked)

Political Weirdos

720 readers
6 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 180 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Wtaf is that guy on?

"You voted for Harris that means I would turn you into my boy harem but I can't because of social media"

The logic is not flowing

[–] [email protected] 50 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Or doesn't know the meaning of concubines. Begging the question what _did_he mean?

[–] the_crotch 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I’m guessing he thought it was a fancy term for slaves. Which is wrong in a lot of ways, but also just weird..

It’s the best read of it I can manage though..

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

Nah bro. He’s just copped to tryna fuck kids. Just republican shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I bet he was being polite and he actually wanted to write "you would be my bitches". Not polite, MAGA polite.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines.

I don't know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it's because I'm not into any sketchy shit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's the step between mistress and partner.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh.......yeah, I was thinking it was much darker. It sounds like some kind of metalic tub that you put children in to rape them in the fields of Alaska at an oil rig job.

At least with mistress's and partners consent is a key factor.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In several countries, and absolutely historically, it’s actually been a government-classified relationship status.

It just means people involved in a romantic and sexual relationship who are unwilling or unable to legally marry for whatever reason (because they are already married, because they aren’t legally qualified, such as one member is from a slave caste, etc)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's an old term for a pleasure slave.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

No, concubinage was typically consensual.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

By definition of concubine, sure, but consensual is a far cry for most. I'm trying to remember the exact quote, but I'll paraphrase it here: 'In slave-owning societies, the vast majority of concubines were slaves.' https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000klei for the source.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Historically consent has often been quite optional, when it comes to marriage, concubinage, and the like...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're right. It doesn't make logical sense.

Oh, I meant you. You just tried to read a tweet where a republican just admitted to being a pedo, and your first instinct was to try to follow the logic.

That corse of action doesn't make logical sense!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Well considering they're all literally adults, I'd say there's no pedophilia happening here. Also, if you're going to call somebody illogical at least make sure you can spell correctly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Isn't it though?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

My best guess is that by social media he means because they're online, not around him?