this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
108 points (90.9% liked)

Political Memes

5501 readers
2046 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Voroxpete 15 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The fasces was originally a symbol of Roman imperial authority and power. I'm not sure how it ever could have been a socialist or progressive symbol.

(Yes, I know the interpretation about the bundle of rods being stronger together - fascism is a collectivist ideology, just one with a distinctly narrowed definition of the collective - but trying to apply it to socialism just because it has collectivist themes ignores a) the history of the symbol, and b) THE BLOODY GREAT AXE IN THE MIDDLE KEEPING EVERYONE ELSE IN LINE).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

The fasces was originally a symbol of Roman imperial authority and power. I’m not sure how it ever could have been a socialist or progressive symbol.

(Yes, I know the interpretation about the bundle of rods being stronger together - fascism is a collectivist ideology, just one with a distinctly narrowed definition of the collective - but trying to apply it to socialism just because it has collectivist themes ignores a) the history of the symbol, and b) THE BLOODY GREAT AXE IN THE MIDDLE KEEPING EVERYONE ELSE IN LINE).

Actually, the fasces predates the Imperial era of Rome, and is, indeed, less important and prominent in the Imperial era. The fasces is most strongly associated with the Republican era of Rome, when it was a symbol of magisterial power and authority, as opposed to arbitrary, personal, or royal authority (though it originates in the monarchy, there's a long, LONG discussion that can be had there about the Roman monarchy and its unique attributes that would be a very winding aside, so let's skip it for now). The bundling of the sticks represents the strength of the collective in imbuing power on the magistrate; the axe represents the power of life and death granted to magistrates by the people.

Obviously this is a bit more stark than symbols we prefer in the modern day - and rightly so. In the modern day, we don't need to be reminded that authorities are granted power over us by our consent; we need to be reminded that the authorities are granted power over us by our consent. But the origins of it are very much republican and, while I would hesitate to say explicitly democratic, considering the structure of the Roman Republic, more democratic than authoritarian.

Funny enough, the sticks were the more prominent symbol of keeping people in line. The axe was used only for executions, which would have been exceptionally rare (the first execution with the fasces' axe being used on those literally conspiring to restore the monarchy), while the sticks were used for corporal punishment, both subject to an appeal to the people before punishment.

For that reason, the fasces was widely used in republican movements in the 18th and 19th centuries, back when everyone was a Romaboo, and only rarely in monarchial movements outside of throwbacks like Napoleon.

[–] Voroxpete 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry, you are correct about it being a Republican, not Imperial symbol.

In everything else, you're basically confirming what I said with additional detail. There's no good reason why socialists should want to use a symbol whose underlying message is "Stand in line or we'll beat you down."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

In everything else, you’re basically confirming what I said with additional detail. There’s no good reason why socialists should want to use a symbol whose underlying message is “Stand in line or we’ll beat you down.”

The underlying message, I would argue, is "This authority exercised in this place or by this person is granted by the people", though, again, I agree that it's not very useful a symbol in the modern day.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m not sure how it ever could have been a socialist or progressive symbol.

Where did I say it could have been a socialist or a progressive symbol?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think they were referring to PugJesus’s earlier comment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, where did PugJesus say it could have been a socialist or progressive symbol?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

“ I'm still salty that fascists stole the fasces tbh”

Implies that PugJesus would have wanted to use the symbol to describe their ideology. And since PugJesus is on this community you can be pretty sure they are a leftist of some sort.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think that I would want it to describe my ideology, but I would like to be able to see it without thinking "Goddamn fascists, the lowest of all scum", considering its long history without fascism. Sadly, the fascists have taken that from all of us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you took it one step too far... For example, I can say that I'm salty at the Nazis for stealing the swastika (which is true, btw, that shit pisses me off) without being a Buddhist or whatever

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago