Ask Lemmy

26980 readers

1247 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

candyman337

[email protected]

890

Opinions: What is a movie you genuinely like, that is rated below 60% on rotten tomatoes? (xkcd.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

1107 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Inspired by the linked XKCD. Using 60% instead of 50% because that's an easy filter to apply on rottentomatoes.

I'll go first: I think "Sherlock Holmes: A game of Shadows" was awesome, from the plot to the characters ,and especially how they used screen-play to highlight how Sherlocks head works in these absurd ways.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I unironically enjoy both the 2005 and 2007 Fantastic Four movies. Were they cheesy as hell? Yep, but damn sure the source material is just as cheesy sometimes. Could the MCU do them better now? Almost certainly. Still fun movies, except for making Galactus the Glow Cloud (all hail). They fucked up a lot of Doom's backstory, but I like Julian McMahon (even if this also wasn't the best role for him).

Also, Chris Evans exiting the shower. Damn.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Bro the human torch bromance with The thing is the best.

And best part is that CAPTAIN RAYMOND JACOB HOLT SHOWS UP IN THERE.

what's not to love

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Thats America's Abs

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

To add to that I enjoyed the second film more than the first. I also was OK with Galactus the glow cloud. I get that making Galactus a cloud means it isn't really Galactus and then calling that cloud Galactus is stupid, but conceptually a world eating universe cloud is neat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You know what... At least the first one isn't bad. I enjoyed myself with it. It doesn't beat the modern super hero movies but that doesn't make it bad especially for the time