this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3095 readers
114 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has dismissed suggestions that plans to provide weight loss jabs to unemployed people with obesity are "dystopian".

The UK government is partnering with pharmaceutical giant Lilly who are running a five-year trial in Greater Manchester to test if the weight-loss drug Mounjaro can help get more people back to work and prevent obesity-related diseases to ease the strain on the NHS in England.

The announcement prompted a backlash, with accusations that the government was stigmatising unemployed individuals and reducing people to their economic value.

Speaking on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Streeting said the jabs were part of a broader healthcare plan, adding that he was "not interested in some dystopian future where I involuntarily jab unemployed people who are overweight".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Isn't the dystopian bit of this the scary capitalism of it? This approach allows the food industry to continue selling people crap that is making them unhealthy rather than reforming their business model, and it's doing this by handing a massive amount of money to the pharma industry. This is exactly the solution I'd want if I were a wealthy investor with money in lots of vast global businesses, and for me that's the dystopian bit - the way it's all about handing money to The Man to continue unhealthy lives rather than, y'know, fix anything a bit

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The drug works mostly by them no longer wanting to eat it.

This isn't a way to lose weight without changing diet, it's a way to change diet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Sure, appetite drops a bit in that specific person, but this still doesn't do anything to motivate the big food industry to change its ways - they can assume that specific person will still eat their products, and can carry on selling ultra-processed food to everyone else

[–] thetreesaysbark 3 points 1 month ago

I hear you. But this isn't necessarily one or the other. I think it's beneficial to have these types of product available for those who have already become obese, whilst leglistating the food that people are pushed towards eating by the system.

I'm not saying that the government will necessarily do both, but that it's not an issue with this study that the food available isn't being managed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But this drug doesn't do that. A major way it works is by massively curtailing your appetite.

This literally helps you stop endlessly consuming.

If we're going to twist this into a thing related to capitalism, then it is an anti-capitalist medication.

It's the diametric opposite of what you suggest.

E: you're getting offended at a description of what a drug does. That isn't normal.