this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
643 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

11243 readers
2879 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I don't get the ai hate sentiment. In fact I want ai to be so good that it steals all our jobs. Every single "worker" on the planet. The only job I don't think they can steal is that of middle management because I don't think we have digitized data on how to suck your own dick. After everybody is jobless, then we would be free. We won't need the rich. They can be made into a fine broth.

Sarcasm aside, I really believe we should automate all menial jobs, crunch more data and make this world a better place, not steal creative content made by humans and make second rate copies.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem with AI isn't the tech itself. It's what capitalism is doing with it. Alongside what you say, using AI to achieve fully automated luxury gay space communism would be wonderful.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe problem is, you know, capitalism?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Just noticed... Did I reply to wrong comment? I wanted to use this as reply to one with "AI is bad" and without "capitalism makes it bad".

Derp.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

I don't know if you've been paying attention to everything that's happened since the industrial revolution but that's not how it's going to work

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I don't get the ai hate sentiment.

I don't get what's not to get. AI is a heap of bullshit that's piled on top of a decade of cryptobros.

it's not even impressive enough to make a positive world impact in the 2-3 years it's been publicly available.

shit is going to crash and burn like web3.

I've seen people put full on contracts that are behind NDAs through a public content trained AI.

I've seen developers use cuck-pilot for a year and "never" code again... until the PR is sent back over and over and over again and they have to rewrite it.

I've seen the AI news about new chemicals, new science, new _fill-in-the-blank and it all be PR bullshit.

so yeah, I don't believe AI is our savior. can it make some convincing porn? sure. can it do my taxes? probably not.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (13 children)

You are ignoring ALL of the of the positive applications of AI from several decades of development, and only focusing on the negative aspects of generative AI.

Here is a non-exhaustive list of some applications:

  • In healthcare as a tool for earlier detection and prevention of certain diseases
  • For anomaly detection in intrusion detection system, protecting web servers
  • Disaster relief for identifying the affected areas and aiding in planning the rescue effort
  • Fall detection in e.g. phones and smartwatches that can alert medical services, especially useful for the elderly.
  • Various forecasting applications that can help plan e.g. production to reduce waste. Etc...

There have even been a lot of good applications of generative AI, e.g. in production, especially for construction, where a generative AI can the functionally same product but with less material, while still maintaining the strength. This reduces cost of manufacturing, and also the environmental impact due to the reduced material usage.

Does AI have its problems? Sure. Is generative AI being misused and abused? Definitely. But just because some applications are useless it doesn't mean that the whole field is.

A hammer can be used to murder someone, that does not mean that all hammers are murder weapons.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When I hear "AI", I think of that thing that proofreads my emails and writes boilerplate code. Just a useful tool among a long list of others. Why would I spend emotional effort hating it? I think people who "hate" AI are just as annoying as the people pushing it as the solution to all our problems.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think anybody hates spell checkers if that's what you consider "AI".

It's more about the grifters pushing this phony "intelligence" as the savior/destroyer of humanity.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

when I get an email written by AI, it means the person who sent it doesn't deem me worth their time to respond to me themselves.

I get a lot of email that I have to read for work. It used to be about 30 a day that I had to respond to. now that people are using AI, it's at or over 100 a day.

I provide technical consulting and give accurate feedback based on my knowledge and experience on the product I have built over the last decade and a half.

if nobody is reading my email why does it matter if I'm accurate? if generative AI is training on my knowledge and experience where does that leave me in 5 years?

business is built on trust, AI circumvents that trust by replacing the nuances between partners that grow that trust.

[–] explodicle 1 points 1 month ago

Hi there GreenKnight23!

I don't think it's necessarily you personally they find a waste of time... it might be the layers of fluff that most business emails contain. They don't know if you're the sort of person who expects it.

Best Regards,

Explodicle Internet Comment Writer sh.itjust.works

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If I just hand wave all the good things and call them bullshit, AI is nothing more than bad things!

  • Lemmy
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Current "AI's" (LLMs) are only useful for art and non-fact based text. The two things people particularly do not need computers to do for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Llms fucking suck. But that's the worst kind of ai. It's just an autocorrect on steroids. But you know what a good ai is? The one that give an amino acid sequence predicts it's 3d structure. It's mind boggling. We can design personal protein robots with that kind of knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree, but the reason for all the AI hate is companies pushing LLMs, calling them AIs, and treating them like some miracle that is worth all the energy they consume. If we try to differentiate between LLMs and AI then the AI hate will go away.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly. Llms are a mockery of this tech. They have become so powerful because of the amount of compute we have invested in it. Think if Alpha fold got that much gpu time and de's working how amazing it would be. Heck we need to understand the human genome whose only 1-2% is understood. Apply AI to that instead of an AI that spouts out cheap Shakespeare knockoffs and shitty code.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I complete agree, but the original question was why people hate on AIs so much, and the reason is LLMs

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I just hand wave all the bad things and call them amazing, AI is everything but the bad things!

  • ~~cryptobros~~ AI evangelists
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What do you think AI has to do with crypto, other than that they are both technologies which have entered the mainstream recently and been pushed hard? Like, what do they actually have in common?

[–] Jakeroxs 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People think they're bad /s ;)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Jakeroxs 2 points 1 month ago

I think there are some fair reasons, and some... Just ignorant parroted opinions lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

it’s not even impressive enough to make a positive world impact in the 2-3 years it’s been publicly available.

It literally just won people two Nobel prizes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How does that help the rest of us?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It allows us to predict the structure of proteins before we make them. This can speed up research into protein-based medical treatments by astronomical amounts-- drugs which took years to develop through trial and error and/or thousands of hours of computational power can now be predicted beforehand in terms of their structure, which allows us to predict how they interact woth the proteins in our body. It's an incredible breakthrough in the speed of medical research.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

with the compute power required for models like alphafold, my guess is it will be at the monopoly of some corporation which will charge exorbitant prices for any drugs it develops through AI. Not a fault of AI itself, just fucking parasitic shareholder pigs which we should have eaten long ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Damn I hope not but yeah probably :(

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am talking about them winning the award

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That's a bad faith question, but I'll answer it anyways. It helps us because it means that we may now use the discoveries that won them the award.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

It's hype like this that breaks the back of the public when "AI doesn't change anything". Don't get me wrong: AlphaFold has done incredible things. We can now create computational models of proteins in a few hours instead of a decade. But the difference between a computational model and the actual thing is like the difference between a piece of cheese and yellow plastic: they both melt nicely but you'd never want one of them in your quesadilla.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

Hooray for them. \s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

If AI image generation is so bad why we have so many etsy and patreon artists complaining about it?

If no one would use it because it is so bad why would anyone care that it is trained on their products?

Do you know this joke about MAGA and the Schrodinger's immigrant? They somehow believe that immigrants are both stealing people jobs and lazy and living on wellfare.

AntiAI bros are somehow similar. AI is at the same time stealing artists jobs and completely useless incapable of producing nothing that people would want.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Had me in the first half, not gonna lie

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would love AI. Still waiting for it. Probably 50 years away (if human society lasts that long).

What I hate is the term being yet another scientific term to get stolen and watered down by brainless capitalists so they can scam money out of other brainless capitalists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What I hate is the term being yet another scientific term ~~to get stolen and watered down~~ created by ~~brainless capitalists~~ researchers and scientists so they can ~~scam money out of~~ describe ideas to other ~~brainless capitalists~~ researchers and scientists.

The term AI as we use it today has been in use in the field of computer science for more than 50 years

The term that you describe as AI is what researchers in the field have called AGI for more than a decade.

The only place where AI is used to mean a artificial intelligence on the same level of humans is in fucking science fiction.

Is it hard to comprehend that when people say AI on the topic of something made by computer scientists they refer to the thing computer scientists call AI?

Do you go on gaming conversations and say: "Um... Akshually... it's not AI... it's just a behaviour heuristics 🤓"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Brainless capitalists" weren't invented in 2019.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh yes, Alan Turing, such a famous capitalist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I suppose you did say more than fifty years, which technically includes someone that died in 1954, but he also defined it in a way that even current models don't meet, so here we are, back at brainless capitalists.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

they will automate all menial jobs, fire %90 of the workers and ask remaining %10 to oversee the AI automated tasks while also doing all other tasks which can not be automated. all so that shareholders can add some more billions on top of their existing stack of billions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

For me, it's because AI is referring to a LLM, which is not AI. Also, these LLMs use a crap load of energy to do things that we can currently do ourselves for much less energy.

But actual AI? Yes, please!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Sure, Eli Whitney.

How about the machines automate the complicated jobs to make as many menial jobs for me as possible? Computers these days are all lazy. They could optimize scheduling so the neighbors and I all get time together and time apart for a hundred hours of kicking dirt down at the office each year, instead they hang around doing vapes and abstract paintings of hands.