this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
752 points (99.6% liked)

Games

32695 readers
1053 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eezyville 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't nobody want that trash codebase.

[–] GhiLA 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Hobbyists have made Pokemon clones in their basement for decades. They never needed the source code.

If I'm not mistaken, there's an entire online RPG ran by hobbyists.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

It's not about the code. It's about sending a message.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe this was an intentional leak. Now the Nintendo lawyers can claim they've used stolen proprietary code?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Copyright of code doesn't work that way. Now if some idiot goes and uses that code in a game, yeah, they'd have a rough time in court.

If Nintendo thought there was infringement already, and wanted to prove it in court, there are means to securely prove it with redactions and NDA's and so forth as it would be considered trade secret.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think they may be making a joke about how flimsy Nintendo's patent case is, since the alleged patent was filed this past July

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They literally never introduce any new concepts to their games I think the last new innovation in the pokemon game is supposed to allow you to have two vs two. That was about 10 years ago I think

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm so so sorry to do this to you. Double battles were introduced with Ruby and Sapphire... 22 years ago...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Vicious rumor spreading will not be tolerated. The '90s were 15 years ago

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Already 15? Wow time flies

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like to shit on Pokemon and Nintendo as much as the rest of them but this isn't really true. Legends: Arceus, while not a great pokemon game overall, introduced several new mechanics, some of which then made their way into Scarlet/Violet. The biggest and best of which, in my opinion, is the ability to catch wild pokemon without battling them.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You have always been able to throw a ball at an unharmed Pokémon to capture it. Just had a very low chance of success unless it was either very low level or it was a great ball or one of the other ones they introduced later. But even back in red and blue you could always try it and it might work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

but you still had to initiate a battle. Unless you're just playing stupid, you should go watch some Arceus gameplay to see what I mean.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I think there are triple battles now. Those might be 10 years old