this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
435 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4119 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Trump laid blame for the conflict on President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, his Democratic rival in November. He said Biden “egged it all on” by pledging to help Ukraine defend itself rather than pushing it to cede territory to Russia.

“Biden and Kamala allowed this to happen by feeding Zelenskyy money and munitions like no country has ever seen before,” Trump said.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why didn't he resolve the conflict during his presidency?

Or we also believe him that it didn't exist when he was president? His first impeachment was for blocking already approved aid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He thinks it all works on respect. That Putin wouldn't have done it because of respect.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I think just the opposite. he won’t say it directly but if you put all the pieces together he's saying we shouldn't care about ukraine and he would have just let Russia take it. That's probably why Putin decided to strike while trump was in office.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Two different things. He, like mob bosses, demand respect and all that.

And he doesn't care about Ukraine. So he'll serve it up on a platter.

[–] piccolo 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Given he wants to dismantle NATO... you're probably right

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Trump needs to play less GTA2.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

It's great when his arguments only strengthen my resolve to stand with Democrats in supporting Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

"they didn't extort ukraine for oppo research hard enough!"

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

feeding Zelenskyy money and munitions like no country has ever seen before

Except the Soviet Union during WW2. But we all know Trump is on the wrong side of that one too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Have you heard the joke?

Putin summons the ghost of Stalin. "Help me Stalin, I'm having trouble with nazis".

Stalin says "Just do what I did. Send in your best troops, the Ukrainians, and ask the US for supplies."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

A lot of Russian "tankies" believe this unironically tho - that Putin should demonstratively purge the corrupt high command (which really is corrupt), nationalize our heavy industry such as car manufacturers, and force mobilize the masses to work on those plants, because otherwise we are at a real risk of losing to some stupid khokhols and their american overlords.

They don't understand that Putin runs on personal loyalty first and foremost and purging anyone for mere corruption and incompetence is unthinkable (he is merciless to people he sees as traitors however). It's not how the system works at a fundamental level