this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
240 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59105 readers
3131 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 143 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Wow.. While the action is ethically crappy, I never would have thought that to be an arrestable offense. Using the actresses to generate new nudes and porn scenes? Sure, but to literally cut out the nude scenes from real movies? Kind of crazy to get arrested for that without some sort of warning or cease and desist letter first.

[–] conciselyverbose 74 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, an arrest for something that would be generally understood to be fair use is a lot.

I can see the case for "that's not fair use". I'm not necessarily convinced either way. But an arrest?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Looks like this is happening in Denmark, which has different laws than the US's "fair use."

[–] conciselyverbose 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I get that, but the general understanding of fair use is relatively homogeneous. I'm not saying they shouldn't be able to take it down, just that an arrest for it when most people's first guess would be that it's legal seems harsh.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I get that, but the general understanding of fair use is relatively homogeneous.

No, not at all. Only the anglo american culture has that term. Greek/Roman influenced cultures think quite differently about copyright topics in general. African and Asian, I don't know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Not at all. The US conserves something of the enlightenment tradition of freely sharing information; vital for the advancement of science, technology, and culture. Free speech and free press means that you can say and print what you like (press at the time literally meant the printing press, not the media). Limitations in the form of copyrights or patents are only allowed where it helps those goals.

Continental European copyright preserves a monarchical, aristocratic tradition. It's rooted in ideas of personal privilege and honor. For example, it's illegal to deface an artwork even when you own it because it's an attack on the honor of the artist. The term "royalties" comes from the fact that it was a privilege granted by royalty.

It's revealing that Europe has basically the same patent system as the US. You can't do without technology, even if you are an authoritarian ruler. What would your armies do? But copyright is just about culture, usually. You don't want that to be a needless source of instability. You want a clique of cronies to be in charge of that. That's what you see in Europe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Has Denmark ever arrested anyone before for copyright infringement? In most other places this is a civil, not a criminal thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's not true at all, there are criminal penalties on the books for this sort of thing in pretty much all western countries

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Has Denmark...

Show's FBI warning.

You know that the FBI is not a Denmark thing right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Fair use for tugging it

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A porn company could make the same, out-of-context argument just to slap an extra charge onto the arrest. That 2 minutes of badly acted exposition was a critical reason why she's taking cocks in 3 holes. It's really a lovely scene you turned into pure filth!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I think the judge would know it when they see it and laugh them out of the court room.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I am very shocked for the whole thing,This is a very bad precedent.

The man literally did something that the website itself allows by default (by allowing the subreddit) the one at fault here is Reddit, not the man himself. They are the ones who should deal with the consequences.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Ehhhhh.... that's a pretty shit take. Any site that allows uploads of files "allows" uploads of CSAM? See how that breaks down immediately?