this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
1236 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

7425 readers
2135 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (5 children)

What the hell is in those e-mails that requires 2 days of pondering?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Requests for available meeting times. I figure if I drag my feet on scheduling a meeting someone urgently wants to have they'll eventually just email the fucking questions and save us both 90 minutes of pointless bullshit.

I actually made an online meeting request process with a minimum 2-week turnaround just to make scheduling meetings with my department annoying. I only have so much time, and if I honored all requests I'd be spending 60+ hours a week in meetings and none actually doing my job.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In a project manager. Meetings are my job. If I made my customers wait two weeks to schedule a meeting, I’d be fired. Two weeks to hold it? Maybe. Two weeks to schedule? No.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Could you perhaps cut down on the number of meetings you have? I've found that 99% of meetings I get invited to could usually have been an email or a slack message, but then people just want to waste time talking to make it look like they're doing stuff instead of actually just doing stuff.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"Would you please send me that report we talked about? And also let me know which time period you would travel back to if you had a time machine and could only use it once?"

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd go back to 2019 and marry my wife again 🥰

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And also let me know which time period you would travel back to if you had a time machine and could only use it once?”

I mean, is there any valid answer aside from the '90s? '80s were cool but still too backwards, plus you still got the cool stuff from then in the later decade, anything before is "I don't want to die of a minor sickness" territory.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

The 1920's to the 1970's are a no go just from the leaded gas use alone. Short BttF trip, sure, but I wouldn't want to live through that shit. If we think micro plastics is bad now, we use to put fast food in styrofoam up to the 80's.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Naw fuck it, when were tyrannosaurs around? I pick then

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, seems like an exciting way to kill myself. Better than my current life plans so why not? No one said I had to survive in the past, just visit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Oh I'd try my best to survive. I wonder how much shit I can cram in the time machine; I can probably rig a generator to run off a wood fire

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The first diesel engine ran on coal dust. I'm sure you could modify a diesel generator to run on charcoal dust, which you could make with a wood fire.

[–] Curufeanor 1 points 10 months ago

Search "Wood Gasification Engine" online.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I had been thinking straight-up steam, hadn't even considered charcoal/bio diesel.

Though I do like the wood gas idea; should be easy to retune a propane engine for it

[–] CCF_100 12 points 10 months ago

I sense a fellow autistic individual

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I personally ignore emails with vague responses, especially if they treat email like a text message. Im not interested in instant communication via email.

For example:

"Can we meet?"

Should have answered the 5 Ws and name a time so the email is actionable. Otherwise I'll boomerang it and reply in a few days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah but this person isn't simply ignoring it, they eventually answer, allegedly after long consideration.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Eh, I need to find time to fit whatever request came in to my schedule.