this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
539 points (95.3% liked)

World News

38255 readers
2215 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be clear, it wasn’t a “tourist sub”… so maybe the first regulation should be defining exactly what that is,

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The CEO was very careful to skirt applicable regulatory laws. He even called his passengers "crew members". In the aviation world, I have some experience harmonizing multiple regulatory authorities. Because of "international waters", there will need to be some agreement and harmonizing of regulations. There's already SOLAS so, I think it can be done.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A “crew member” would be some kind of employee.

Employees don’t pay a company a quarter of a million dollars to do “work” for eight hours. You don’t pay to work, you get payed to work.

Just because you call someone a crew member doesn’t necessarily mean that would hold up in a court of law.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Technically I believe they were classified as employees that "donated" to the company. Nice workaround Stockton! Let's see how that holds up in court with the obvious gross negligence.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think if they were alive to sue and be sued... He'd be fucked.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Absolutely.

The issue is that the regulations that do exist allow them to skirt it by not offering a hard, and broad, definitions of ‘tourist subs’.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The regulations come from the countries that the company is founded in. OceanGate is (was) as US based company.