this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
49 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3019 readers
253 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They haven't been suspended for voting for the policy, because it wasn't a vote on the policy.

They've been suspended because they voted for an opposition party's amendment to the King's Speech. If you're in the governing party but are voting against your own party's agenda, what else do they expect to happen?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think this is key - it's early days and the new government are still figuring out the size of the mess they've been left with. What they've announced so far are the big policies that they've done their sums on in advance. Scrapping the cap will require them to find a bullion quid from somewhere and that might take time. I have to assume the SNP amendment was at least partially them messing with Labour as they knew it wouldn't get through.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The whole point of these amendments is to just shit on the government and try and make a political point. "Look, this new government voted against taking kids out of poverty!" and all that disingenuous shite.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Indeed - it's political trolling. I seem to recall them doing the same a while ago under the Tories.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I guess that would explain why the Scots sent Labour to parliament instead this time

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's true, it is quite crude of the SNP to try to trip up the party that is clearly closer aligned to its interests.

[–] julietOscarEcho 2 points 1 month ago

They want Westminster to be disfunctional. That's the path towards independence. They're actively opposed to progressive wins. This goes both ways BTW, Labour won't ally with them either. Structurally adversarial politics is crap. Only electoral reform will make it possible for natural allies to actually work together (on the issues where they align).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe the cost of removing the cap is estimated to be 3.5 billion quid

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Very true. Also worth noting that they all won election on the policy of not repealing the limit. It's not like this came out of left field!