Political Memes

5515 readers

730 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1347

$45 Million Per Month, As One Does (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

141 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] iterable -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"Elon Musk says" not a Elon fan but where did he say that? I have only seen them say "Sources close to". If he actually does it and we have records yes it is bad. But right now it's just a rumor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

link is in the first comment

[–] iterable 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nope, nothing there. Still waiting for actual facts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

WASHINGTON, July 15 (Reuters) - Billionaire Elon Musk has said he plans to commit around $45 million a month to a new pro-Trump super political-action committee, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday, citing people familiar with the matter.

So you object to the WSJ, and/or their not-naming their source.

[–] iterable 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, I object to no paper trails or direct videos or quotes from Elon himself saying he will do it. They don't even have a email transaction log or call log to show he has been in contact with the super pac.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Isn’t it the case that the superPAC doesn’t have to reveal its donors?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No problem. You can be on that side, believing all the same stuff, and only be against the more extreme methods of group-based self-deception. It’s just bad internal intelligence methods. No biggie. The core philosophy’s still sound, I’m sure.

[–] iterable 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Are you a bot?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Ofc not, it has human in its name.