this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
37 points (65.3% liked)

News

23310 readers
4317 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why in specific is she a bad choice?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And who realistically is a better choice at this point? I can't think of a single other Democrat with the recognition to pull a presidential campaign together in 3 months.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The only person I have heard that even remotely has a chance of being the pick instead of Harris is Gavin Newsom and he both doesn't seem to want it and also polls really badly against Trump.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, he's widely known outside of California, but largely because he's a massive punching bag for conservatives. Not a good pick for a presidential race.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I think Gavin Newsom will be a very strong candidate if he had time to prime the pump. Which is I imagine what he was planning to do in 2028. A shorter, if we can call four months short good Lord, campaign is not in his favor.

[–] xmunk 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

She performed poorly on the national stage last time she was on it. She has a decent voting record but doesn't have a lot of sponsored legislation. She has a deep flaw from being a former prosecutor. I'm not aware of her having a passion to fix any particular problems.

I think we can do better and choose someone who can excite the voterbase to get folks to turn up. We need to fight voter apathy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

She performed poorly on the national stage last time she was on it.

So like Joe Biden in 2020 who got elected anyway.

She has a decent voting record but doesn’t have a lot of sponsored legislation.

Who gives a shit?

She has a deep flaw from being a former prosecutor.

That is in no way a flaw, let alone a deep one.

On top of that, 13 presidents have been lawyers, including Clinton and Obama.

I’m not aware of her having a passion to fix any particular problems.

Just because you're not aware of something doesn't mean it isn't the case.

[–] xmunk 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m not aware of her having a passion to fix any particular problems.

Just because you're not aware of something doesn't mean it isn't the case.

Let's see if she can deliver a passionate platform, it's kinda her entire job as a politician and if I, a hyperaware political person, am not familiar with it, then most people have no fucking clue.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most people have no fucking clue because she's been in the shadows for four years as VP and I think it was pretty obvious that Obama's former VP was going to get the nomination in 2020.

She still has a lot of time for voters to get to know her and your claim of hyperawareness didn't apparently extend to the fact that a whole lot of presidents have been lawyers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Biden was hardly a foregone conclusion in 2020.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That was almost 4 years ago and she's been VP since. Things have changed.

[–] xmunk 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They have? She's now popular enough to excite the base and win a sweeping victory at the convention?

(Also, I don't know how her being a former prosecutor has changed - and I'm quite doubtful most of my other concerns have shifted either).