this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
15 points (89.5% liked)
Spaceflight
610 readers
36 users here now
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Related meme community:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
With a great flight rate comes great responsibility.
This is a really bad look for the rest of the launch industry that isn't able to step up to fill the gap.
Bad look? What's the Falcon failure rate at this point?
Now what's the failure rate of any other reusable platform?
Bad look for the rest of the industry
The fact that the entire rest of the industry combined can't step up to provide flights is an indicator.
If ULA were to go offline, flights could be moved to other companies and the industry might have a hiccup but would otherwise barely be noticed.
Ah, I didn't catch that meaning. My apologies.