this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
133 points (89.8% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2293 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The first pinned post can be found here:

https://lemmy.world/post/17530961

That's where all the engagement and comments can be found, and I'd encourage everyone to participate there.

The reason for THIS post is to direct everyone there.

I'm getting multiple reports that some people can't see it for some reason. Could be Federation, could be they blocked the user who posted it.

Here's hoping you all can see THIS one and move over to where everyone else is engaged.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That's it.

It's either a trump election win and civil war from him dismantling one too many of the elements of US government.

Or trump looses the election, incites a civil war, and the craziest actually do it.

Either way, as this even proves: Get. Your. Guns. Whilst you still can.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why would Trump losing incite civil war? Who is going to take any weapons from anyone? Who is going to enforce the law? They aren't going to fight themselves. They want a civil war and they want the Dems to just make one mistake to cause it.

There is no way to say that there will be that many of them. There will be a few. But nothing on a scale of civil war. That's some dumb neck beard fantasy. If the Dems win it will be ok. Until the next 4 years.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Trump losing would throw the "stolen election" nonsense into overdrive. Hence the civil war.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I hear that. But who is going to enforce it? The cops? The army? I don't see that happening. They would attack themselves.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Every fascist movement has its paramilitary. Hitler had his Brownshirts, Mussolini had his Blackshirts, and Trump has his Redhats.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Please dont involve Redhat in this mess.

These ae Crimson Caps.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, but IBM bought it so it's evil now. I don't make the rules.

spoiler


(Whether I'm still talking about WWII or more recent shit IBM did is left as an exercise for the reader.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

IBM stopped being relevant since the PC days. The moment the IBM exec who claimed that the market has in-demand for only "5-Mini computers", IBM lost the plot a long long time ago.

Right now, IBM is mostly a holding corp. THey buy stuff, destroy it, and buy more stuff. Most of IBM innovations and engineers have moved on to other companies. IBM have zero or close-to-zero amount of real tech or IP. Most of it is just fluff and overblown BS.

Redhat was already attempting being "like IBM" even before the buyout. But a lot of IBM techs were transferred over to Redhat.

Redhat or IBM is just the lesser of evils. It is like blaming the Abacus maker or the calculator maker for the Nuclear Bomb.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It wouldn't be the cops or the army, it would be his Proud Boys aligned supporters, a la the attempt to kidnap the governor of Michigan.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I dont know if you know, the CIA did a infiltration of a local dad group. Funded them with CIA money to buy guns, ammo, the entire op, planted themselves inside, pushed ideas by asking leading hypothetical questions, coerced them to act in certain suspicious ways.

CIA are the worst thing that 'Muricans have as an agency. Instead of "keep 'Murica safe" they do these BS things which they did all over the world to destabilize legitimate govts.

I wouldnt put it past the cIA to have "setup" a deranged individual with ideas to go do stuff at a rally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Not the CIA, they can't operate inside the United States, but yes, the FBI does radicalization exercises like this quite often:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Portland_car_bomb_plot

https://www.justice.gov/nsd/pr/convicted-bomb-plotter-sentenced-30-years

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What in the fuck are you on? Do you have any sources for this claim?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Not the CIA, they can't operate inside the United States, but yes, the FBI does radicalization exercises like this quite often:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Portland_car_bomb_plot

https://www.justice.gov/nsd/pr/convicted-bomb-plotter-sentenced-30-years

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The proud boys are in jail. Their leaders are in shambles after January 6th.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

A few are, yes, not nearly enough of them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Right, because that’s totally what happened last time

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

It really was close last time.

You look at the fake electors scheme, the attempt to kidnap the governor of Michigan, and January 6th... those are all opening shots in a civil war.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

You will find that civil wars in a digitalized surveillance state are very short lived and that the masses don‘t actually hold all that much power apart from the few things they‘re legally allowed to do. So unless tens of millions just stop showing up to work across the country, I don‘t see how the citizens have any leverage whatsoever once the election is over.

[–] hal_5700X 2 points 4 months ago

Okay, Tim Pool. Whatever you say.