this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
588 points (98.5% liked)

World News

39522 readers
2351 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Public outrage is mounting in China over allegations that a major state-owned food company has been cutting costs by using the same tankers to carry fuel and cooking oil – without cleaning them in between.

The scandal, which implicates China’s largest grain storage and transport company Sinograin, and private conglomerate Hopefull Grain and Oil Group, has raised concerns of food contamination in a country rocked in recent decades by a string of food and drug safety scares – and evoked harsh criticism from Chinese state media.

It was an “open secret” in the transport industry that the tankers were doing double duty, according to a report in the state-linked outlet Beijing News last week, which alleged that trucks carrying certain fuel or chemical liquids were also used to transport edible liquids such as cooking oil, syrup and soybean oil, without proper cleaning procedures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh, right, a communist country is one where there are non-state owned enterprises that people can get rich investing in.

Generating capital is definitely a feature of communism as long as it's fictitious capital. That's why Donald Trump is a communist.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

a communist country is one where there are non-state owned enterprises

Again, I implore you to actually read Marx. "Communism is when nobody owns a toothbrush" is just neoconservative propaganda. This isn't what any AES state practices, much less what the more academic types believe.

Generating capital is definitely a feature of communism as long as it’s fictitious capital.

Nothing precludes you from generating ficticious capital in a communist system. Marxists simply recognize it as such, rather than deluding themselves into believing material value has been created when speculative asset prices rise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Again, I've read Marx and you're putting words in my mouth.

And again, Marx did not in any way advocate for an aristocracy that own private capital (call it fictitious if you like, China does not) and run publicly traded corporations where the workers do not own the means of production. That was literally everything he was fighting against.

There is simply nothing communist about an aristocracy. You can say "read Marx" all you like. Marx was 100% against such things. I know because I read Marx.

By the way, some of those private companies are real estate companies that rent property to Chinese workers for a profit. And if I just read Marx, I'll know he was in favor of such arrangements.

I'm sure Marx would never write anything like:

You are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing society private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population; its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths. You reproach us, therefore, with intending to do away with a form of property, the necessary condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any property for the immense majority of society.

In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your property. Precisely so: that is just what we intend.

That's clearly some Westen imperialist capitalist scum who thinks that way.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Marx did not in any way advocate for an aristocracy

He recognized feudalism as a stage of development. That's very different from advocating for it.

That’s clearly some Westen imperialist capitalist scum

You will routinely see Western imperialist capitalist scum furious over China's domestic ownership rules. Foreign investors can't have a majority stake in Chinese firms. Foreign patents have to be legally shared with domestic universities and labs. Foreign real estate firms can't have primary claim on domestic real property. Chinese protectionist policies guarantee Chinese citizens reap the benefit of domestic investment.

That's the core logic of Socialism, a pivotal post capitalist step that Karl Marx describes and you can learn about IF YOU READ HIS WORKS.

And it is being done within the context of Chinese history and geographic potential. One might even describe it as "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Are you ever going to show me where I claimed China was majority Han or was that trolling?

I've been waiting for an answer and have given you multiple opportunities. I hope for your sake that it wasn't trolling, because you have one more chance to justify it.