this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
241 points (83.6% liked)

News

23024 readers
3443 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One House Democrat said he spoke for others in the wake of the president’s stunningly feeble debate performance on Thursday: “The movement to convince Biden to not run is real.”

The House member, an outspoken defender of the president, said that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer should consider “a combined effort” to nudge President Joe Biden out of the race.

Crestfallen by the president’s weak voice, pallid appearance and meandering answers, numerous Democratic officials said Biden’s bet on an early debate to rebut unceasing questions about his age had not only backfired but done damage that may prove irreversible. The president had, in the first 30 minutes of the debate, fully affirmed doubts about his fitness.

A second House Democrat said “reflection is needed” from Biden about the way ahead and indicated the private text threads among lawmakers were even more dire, with some saying outright that the president needed to drop out of the race.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The conspiracy theorists all say Joe is supposed to step down and Gavin Newsom somehow is added to the ticket which then will win. These conspiracy theorists also say that candidates are selected in advance by the powers that be and it’s all pagentry to deceive the gullible masses. If this is true, then Joe needs no convincing and this is already decided.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'd like to know what you're taking so I never take it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I just had a soda and a vegan burger. So... I guess eat meat and avoid high fructose corn syrup? 🫤

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Phew, I ate a beyond burger earlier and I'm still cogent and coherent. Guess it's the corn syrup, just like my dad warned me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I don't believe this conspiracy theory (or not believe it), I am just saying it exists. But yes, without the corn syrup, I would probably be a better and sexier person.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Then why parrot chafe into the conversation at all?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I am adding it for posterity in case it does happen. I don't believe or disbelieve this, but I have seem "conspiracy theories" proven true later and sometimes it's like people forget the "crazy" people mentioned the truth months or years prior. I want this here so that if proven true, the word "misinformation" will start to be viewed skeptically as the Ministry of Truth word that it is, divorced from science and discourse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Adding distracting points into the public discourse when people are seeking clarity doesn't seem like a noble goal.

What do you get out of it at the end, the ability to say "told you so"?

What if Kamala does step in due to the very real odds of a medical issue happening, then shall we start believing conspiracy theorists on other points?

My point remains the same, you're occluding understanding of the situation, both currently and in the future, and I don't like that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Others are occluding discourse by banning discussion as misinformation to control all narratives, then acting as though conspiracy theorists weren't correct. This narrative control is from an elite whose lies are vast enough to occlude the sun.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Overly dramatic verbiage aside, I'm not seeing any discussion here, of utility anyway.

Good day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The conspiracy theorists all say

He pretty clearly stated that it was the conspiracy nuts in his first comment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Poor fella. Read my question again, but this time try to think about it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's adorable when someone who doesn't understand the concept of discussing an idea's existence tries to be condescending.

For example, I can say "there are people who think the earth is flat" while not endorsing the idea of a flat earth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Cute and useless, as is customary for ya.

People are looking for clarity about all this, I used the word chafe on purpose.

Think about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Oh God, Gavin Newsom ruined SF, which gave him the credentials to ruin California. Now it gives him the credentials to ruin the country?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I'd be cool with that